nijinsky's fetlocks
Well-Known Member
gordondaviesmoustache said:
I would say having an overall majority was convincing,if you fancy £20 to the charity of the winners choice, my friend.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
David Miliband quitting politics. Is Labour dead?
- Thread starter dum spiro spero
- Start date
I would say having an overall majority was convincing,if you fancy £20 to the charity of the winners choice, my friend.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I can hear the backtracking as I type ;-)nijinsky's fetlocks said:gordondaviesmoustache said:Happy to have a wager on this NF. What do you define as "convincingly"?nijinsky's fetlocks said:They are strong favourites to win the next election.
And they will win it convincingly,thankfully with less Blairites.
I would say having an overall majority was convincing,if you fancy £20 to the charity of the winners choice, my friend.
You think a majority of one, with the Electoral system we have, is convincing?
What would be an unconvincing majority?
maineman
Well-Known Member
45 seatsRascal said:gordondaviesmoustache said:Happy to have a wager on this NF. What do you define as "convincingly"?nijinsky's fetlocks said:They are strong favourites to win the next election.
And they will win it convincingly,thankfully with less Blairites.
30 seats
Bigga
Well-Known Member
TheBlueDune said:Other brother might step up - Steve Milliband, but I heard might be a bit of a joker
Utterly wasted on this lot, fella!!
:D
The Ledge
Well-Known Member
Gaylord du Bois said:The blind leaving the blind.
Has Blunkett won a leadership campaign?
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
So less than Wilson secured in 1976 is "convincing"?Rascal said:gordondaviesmoustache said:Happy to have a wager on this NF. What do you define as "convincingly"?nijinsky's fetlocks said:They are strong favourites to win the next election.
And they will win it convincingly,thankfully with less Blairites.
30 seats
Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
If you count beating his Labrador in an arm wrestle then yes, I guess he did.The Ledge said:Gaylord du Bois said:The blind leaving the blind.
Has Blunkett won a leadership campaign?
nijinsky's fetlocks
Well-Known Member
gordondaviesmoustache said:I can hear the backtracking as I type ;-)nijinsky's fetlocks said:gordondaviesmoustache said:Happy to have a wager on this NF. What do you define as "convincingly"?
I would say having an overall majority was convincing,if you fancy £20 to the charity of the winners choice, my friend.
You think a majority of one, with the Electoral system we have, is convincing?
What would be an unconvincing majority?
An unconvincing majority would mean being the largest single party,but lacking enough seats to govern without recourse to some dubious political pact,the like of which your beloved Liberal Sellouttwats currently seem to own the template for.
I'm sure you will probably start the usual Liberal mantra about the single transferrable vote being much fairer than first past the post,but after living through the squalid mess of a coalition that nobody voted for,propped up by your acquiescent Liberal Churchill dogs,forgive me if it falls on deaf ears.
If a horse wins a race by a short head,you get paid the same amount as you would if it won by a distance.
johnny on the spot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jul 2006
- Messages
- 24,748
Well, fuck.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
nijinsky's fetlocks said:If a horse wins a race by a short head,you get paid the same amount as you would if it won by a distance.
Maybe so, but surely even you wouldn't describe that as a "convincing" win?
Apart from when you're picking your winnings up, of course.
25 seats plus majority and you've got a bet...