Rascal
El Presidente
gordondaviesmoustache said:So less than Wilson secured in 1976 is "convincing"?
30 wouldnt be great as i would prefer 649 majority as it meant the country may have seen sense.
gordondaviesmoustache said:So less than Wilson secured in 1976 is "convincing"?
I note you have conspicuously, and to others at least, skillfully avoided the question.Rascal said:gordondaviesmoustache said:So less than Wilson secured in 1976 is "convincing"?
30 wouldnt be great as i would prefer 649 majority as it meant the country may have seen sense.
gordondaviesmoustache said:nijinsky's fetlocks said:If a horse wins a race by a short head,you get paid the same amount as you would if it won by a distance.
Maybe so, but surely even you wouldn't describe that as a "convincing" win?
Apart from when you're picking your winnings up, of course.
25 seats plus majority and you've got a bet...
nijinsky's fetlocks said:gordondaviesmoustache said:nijinsky's fetlocks said:If a horse wins a race by a short head,you get paid the same amount as you would if it won by a distance.
Maybe so, but surely even you wouldn't describe that as a "convincing" win?
Apart from when you're picking your winnings up, of course.
25 seats plus majority and you've got a bet...
Oh go on then - I'll take that.
Let's cyber-shake on it.
gordondaviesmoustache said:nijinsky's fetlocks said:gordondaviesmoustache said:Maybe so, but surely even you wouldn't describe that as a "convincing" win?
Apart from when you're picking your winnings up, of course.
25 seats plus majority and you've got a bet...
Oh go on then - I'll take that.
Let's cyber-shake on it.
Just for JOTL's benefit:
Don't tell that to the Luddites on here. They don't understand the demographics of this country.dum spiro spero said:It all has the smell of the '92 election to me. I just can't see business & media getting behind Labour again. 9/2 Tory majority looks massive to me.
gordondaviesmoustache said:I note you have conspicuously, and to others at least, skillfully avoided the question.Rascal said:gordondaviesmoustache said:So less than Wilson secured in 1976 is "convincing"?
30 wouldnt be great as i would prefer 649 majority as it meant the country may have seen sense.
Old Labour, old danger.
dum spiro spero said:It all has the smell of the '92 election to me. I just can't see business & media getting behind Labour again. 9/2 Tory majority looks massive to me.
Rascal said:gordondaviesmoustache said:I note you have conspicuously, and to others at least, skillfully avoided the question.Rascal said:30 wouldnt be great as i would prefer 649 majority as it meant the country may have seen sense.
Old Labour, old danger.
Rather than Lib Dem sellout.
I will not list the ideals that have been sold in the pursuit of power as it is shameful and a disgrace in British politics that they have allowed the most right wing government in UK history to impose its ideology on this country in exchange for government grace and favour.
How can Liberals even contemplate supporting the nutjob wing of the tory party in there desire for us to join Belorussia and not be signatories to the ECHR
Clegg and his allies have done more to damage the cause of Liberalism than anybody for a hundred years, but then they have had a little power for the first time in a hundred years.
Hopefully the British people will once again consign the Liberals to the edges of politics as they are fucking lowlife scumbags.