Will surpass Colin Bell as the best player to ever play for city in the next few years. Phenomenal
Just a pity he's a daywalker, really. Maybe we can trade him for Rashford?
Percentage? Impossible to know, but I would suggest that out of 60 odd thousand there might be 50 or 60 posts of mine containing the term. So that would be 1 in every 1000 (give or take). I make that 0.1%. Feel free to check my post history though. That's the answer to your first question. As for your second question; no. It's not necessary to use the term "every time" (your expression, which is obviously not true). Finally, the fact that I brought the latest boy wonder at our quiet neighbours into it might have been a clue that the post wasn't meant to be taken all that seriously. I'm surprised that you didn't pick up on that, and chose to have a pop at me instead. Ah well. If I have offended anyone else on here, I apologize.Becoming very tiresome this "daywalker"/"ginger" shit.
You're a great poster Jim but fuck me what percentage of your thousands of posts contain that slur?
Is it really necessary or even funny to refer to his hair/skin colour every time?
He's probably of the fair haired gentleman and easily offended, bit like Kaz :-)Percentage? Impossible to know, but I would suggest that out of 60 odd thousand there might be 50 or 60 posts of mine containing the term. So that would be 1 in every 1000 (give or take). I make that 0.1%. Feel free to check my post history though. That's the answer to your first question. As for your second question; no. It's not necessary to use the term "every time" (your expression, which is obviously not true). Finally, the fact that I brought the latest boy wonder at our quiet neighbours into it might have been a clue that the post wasn't meant to be taken all that seriously. I'm surprised that you didn't pick up on that, and chose to have a pop at me instead. Ah well. If I have offended anyone else on here, I apologize.
I did think your post was funny ...Percentage? Impossible to know, but I would suggest that out of 60 odd thousand there might be 50 or 60 posts of mine containing the term. So that would be 1 in every 1000 (give or take). I make that 0.1%. Feel free to check my post history though. That's the answer to your first question. As for your second question; no. It's not necessary to use the term "every time" (your expression, which is obviously not true). Finally, the fact that I brought the latest boy wonder at our quiet neighbours into it might have been a clue that the post wasn't meant to be taken all that seriously. I'm surprised that you didn't pick up on that, and chose to have a pop at me instead. Ah well. If I have offended anyone else on here, I apologize.
He's probably of the fair haired gentleman and easily offended, bit like Kaz :-)