Instead of pontificating pretentiously in a superficial smugness explain why it is funny when Komps started as a midfielder and in his prime you are saying De Jong would not be a good defender, he did it really well most times he played.
RochBlue said:Instead of pontificating pretentiously in a superficial smugness explain why it is funny when Komps started as a midfielder and in his prime you are saying De Jong would not be a good defender, he did it really well most times he played.
NQCitizen said:RochBlue said:Instead of pontificating pretentiously in a superficial smugness explain why it is funny when Komps started as a midfielder and in his prime you are saying De Jong would not be a good defender, he did it really well most times he played.
He's no good in the air, his tackles would give away a lot of penalties and he wouldn't be all that great bringing the ball out from the back the usual advantage of converting a midfielder to a defender.
RochBlue said:NQCitizen said:RochBlue said:Instead of pontificating pretentiously in a superficial smugness explain why it is funny when Komps started as a midfielder and in his prime you are saying De Jong would not be a good defender, he did it really well most times he played.
He's no good in the air, his tackles would give away a lot of penalties and he wouldn't be all that great bringing the ball out from the back the usual advantage of converting a midfielder to a defender.
Thanks for the input, I am not saying I am right but it pisses me off when you get the pointing giggling girl muppets.
RochBlue said:Instead of pontificating pretentiously in a superficial smugness explain why it is funny when Komps started as a midfielder and in his prime you are saying De Jong would not be a good defender, he did it really well most times he played.
RochBlue said:Instead of pontificating pretentiously in a superficial smugness explain why it is funny when Komps started as a midfielder and in his prime you are saying De Jong would not be a good defender, he did it really well most times he played.
The Fat el Hombre said:RochBlue said:Instead of pontificating pretentiously in a superficial smugness explain why it is funny when Komps started as a midfielder and in his prime you are saying De Jong would not be a good defender, he did it really well most times he played.
Fucking hell, he was actually being serious ^
RochBlue said:The Fat el Hombre said:RochBlue said:Instead of pontificating pretentiously in a superficial smugness explain why it is funny when Komps started as a midfielder and in his prime you are saying De Jong would not be a good defender, he did it really well most times he played.
Fucking hell, he was actually being serious ^
What is so incredible? Garcia has covered at centre back on occasions, is he so much better than De Jong, especially tackling?
De Jong was playing the same role 20 yards forward, he was not an attacking Midfielder.
I am not saying he would be first on the list and take on the role permanently as we need someone at the same class as Kompany to compete at the highest level but he would be a good backup.
Nice to know you also respect fellow Blues.