itisrising
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 4,363
Why is everyone quoting 91m when the article stated over 100m Euros?
£91 million?Why is everyone quoting 91m when the article stated over 100m Euros?
If we did pay all the Sane money and more towards Kane, it’d be with a view to replace Aguero long term...so no rush. Let him take time to relax into the role and learn the Pep ways this season. Then start playing more next season.Way too expensive just to sit on the bench and mouth breathe all the air.
Because that’s the exchange rate?Why is everyone quoting 91m when the article stated over 100m Euros?
Why is everyone quoting 91m when the article stated over 100m Euros?
Not if he only wants Bayern we wouldn't.We'd probably get more than 90 mil next year once madrid and psg are interested
I’ll
if we fid pay all the Sane money and more towards Kane, it’s be with a view to replace Aguero long term...so no rush. Let him take time to relax into the role and learn the Pep ways this season. Then start playing more next season.
Ok you are right,he is shite and the centurians season when he won young player of the year never happened,we have been carrying him for years,silly melol there is a clear difference between raz and sane if you watch them closely. raheem connects the play and makes intelligent runs whereas most of sane's goals and assists are due to his pace and kevin or silva provide him with a through ball. without them he will not be influencing the game much, he is one dimensional and no way instrumental to our play. he is just an option and we need to replace him.
If we are going to spend it on a Spurs player I’d rather have SonIf we fid pay all the Sane money and more towards Kane, it’d be with a view to replace Aguero long term...so no rush. Let him take time to relax into the role and learn the Pep ways this season. Then start playing more next season.