BrianW said:
There are lots of things a state can do that an individual can't (lawfully) - tax citizens, conscript citizens into the armed forces, imprison people, fine people, declare war, make treaties with other nations, make laws that are binding on citizens - the list goes on. So I don't buy the argument that capital punishment is equivalent to murder. If it is, fining someone for speeding is theft.
I am however persuaded by the argument that says it just isn't practicable. The law makes too many mistakes. Innocent people would end up being executed.
I do however think that most murderers - and certainly the likes of Hindley and Brady, to name but two - should stay inside until they die. And they should be made to work until they reach retirement age, at least eight hours a day. No work - OK mate, you get just enough food and drink to keep you alive, the same menu every day, and you stay in your cell 24/7/365.
Agree with all of this, and I am also against the death penalty.
It's interesting to hear that people think the death penalty is purely for 'Revenge,' yet are quite happy to say that life imprisonment with no parole, minimal facilities, stone beds, no windows, poor food etc; isn't.
Not that I've got a problem with this form of 'punishment' for the likes of the two walking abortions who subjected that little boy to such suffering, but the fact is that revenge is part of our psyche.