Tricky_Trev
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 33,246
As soon as Sullivan gets Arsenal’s final offer, there’ll be no talk of us preparing a bid any more.
Exactly, he’ll either accept it and we move on having never bid or City match it on better terms. Why rush in with a bid when you can wait for the other bidding party to table their final offer and lay all their cards on the table. It stops a bidding war like West Ham want.As soon as Sullivan gets Arsenal’s final offer, there’ll be no talk of us preparing a bid any more.
I’m pretty relaxed about this tbh. Will be chuffed if we get him, but not gutted if we don’t either. As City fans we should know by now to trust the process. If it’s not Rice, it’ll be someone else similarly good. They don’t get many transfers wrong.
As soon as Sullivan gets Arsenal’s final offer, there’ll be no talk of us preparing a bid any more.
I disagree. There are different kinds of ambition and signing for City is really just the easier option on the scale of ambition. Ambition isn’t just taking the easy option of just signing for a team that already wins titles.If he chose Arsenal over City then that would show a massive lack of ambition. Like imagine the likes of Haaland making that choice, it just wouldn’t happen. He could potentially end up back in the Europa League a year from now with no chance of winning the league or champions league.
That’s pretty much the opposite of City’s transfer strategy for all players we’ve taken an interest over the last 8 years.If our people want him, we will outbid them. That is certain.
Only if Rice wants to go to Arsenal.
This 'Sullivan uses City to get more money' take doesn't make a lot of sense. Why would we tolerate it? We can dismiss the rumour.
We shop at harrods not AldiActually think Mason Mount would be a good fit.
There have been a couple dismissing the claim that City were 'preparing a bid' or had intentions of bidding. Didn't go as far as denying interest, but did dampen diMarzio's claims. Which is consistent with the take that WH are tempting Arsenal to go higher faster.
I disagree. There are different kinds of ambition and signing for City is really just the easier option on the scale of ambition. Ambition isn’t just taking the easy option of just signing for a team that already wins titles.
If Rice wants to and does sign for Arsenal, his ambition is there in the form of him thinking that he’s the player who can make Arsenal a title winning team. There’ll be a drive there for him to make the difference.
Same with City’s signing of the likes of Gareth Barry; he could have taken the easy option signed for United or Chelsea, he was good enough to play for anyone, but all those early takeover signings chose City to be the players that pushed us on to win titles we’d been missing for so long.
I can’t stand Arsenal, but I won’t begrudge or belittle Rice’s choice if he wants to sign for them.
You are correct, sir!Take it you do not follow the Cubs or Sox after that analysis of the Gods of Manchester ;-)
Agreed, our interest is clearly genuine. Doesn’t mean we’ll necessarily get him, but I think it’s nonsense to suggest that we’re being used here. As you say, City could’ve easily shot this down over the last 48 hours if we weren’t in for him.Only if Rice wants to go to Arsenal.
This 'Sullivan uses City to get more money' take doesn't make a lot of sense. Why would we tolerate it? We can dismiss the rumour.
Might be wrong but I think we want to sign Rice. If he wants to come, we'll pay what it takes to have him. It's up to him.
We probably have our price 75+15 . West Ham will probably extract 85/90+15 from Arsenal
Agreed, our interest is clearly genuine. Doesn’t mean we’ll necessarily get him, but I think it’s nonsense to suggest that we’re being used here. As you say, City could’ve easily shot this down over the last 48 hours if we weren’t in for him.