Yes really. I am that petty.There are still City fans who are G/A merchants re Grealish? Really?
Yes really. I am that petty.There are still City fans who are G/A merchants re Grealish? Really?
It’s trueNot saying it’s correct but Talksport saying Arsenal have made a revised bid of £100m up front with £5m add ons. I doubt they’ve got £20m to give anyone upfront.
Pep wanted Maguire, Sanchez, Fred, Kane, Cucurella and Jorginho...........and did they happen?Yep you're wrong
We don't just bid once and walk away
Pep wants him and he's a better manager than you
Yes that oneThis Grealish?
View attachment 84765
I think it’s £100m guaranteed rather than £100m up front. It will be £100m to West Ham but over a few years.Not saying it’s correct but Talksport saying Arsenal have made a revised bid of £100m up front with £5m add ons. I doubt they’ve got £20m to give anyone upfront.
We want a Footballer, not a Basketball player. Do we really need another defensive midfield player? We have Rodri and Phillips (who isn't that much worse than Rice). Phillips needs another season.
I personally don't think Rice is good enough to play the system we play, and one of my mates who's a Big West Ham fan says the same - nowhere near good enough for City. He's not got the pace of pass. Barella/FDJ are much better options for me.
We want a Footballer, not a Basketball player. Do we really need another defensive midfield player? We have Rodri and Phillips (who isn't that much worse than Rice). Phillips needs another season.
I personally don't think Rice is good enough to play the system we play, and one of my mates who's a Big West Ham fan says the same - nowhere near good enough for City. He's not got the pace of pass. Barella/FDJ are much better options for me.
The narrative would swiftly change to “we need to spend 105m just to compete with City”, and we’ll still be maligned as the distorting factor within the market.So, if Arsenal bag Rice for that price, I'm guessing they can't use the "City just bought success" argument anymore.