You're getting confused; that was the Ball/Clarke era!!blueste41 said:Only because it gives the media another stick to beat us with.
But if it meant we won the title, I would be happy to see 11 oompa-loompas run out for us!
Jones, Cleverley, Smalling, Rooney, Ferdinand?uwe rosler 28 said:Can anyone tell me a english outfield player that would have got in our team yesterday?
jimharri said:You're getting confused; that was the Ball/Clarke era!!blueste41 said:Only because it gives the media another stick to beat us with.
But if it meant we won the title, I would be happy to see 11 oompa-loompas run out for us!
Jones, Cleverley, Smalling, Rooney, Ferdinand?uwe rosler 28 said:Can anyone tell me a english outfield player that would have got in our team yesterday?
jimharri said:You're getting confused; that was the Ball/Clarke era!!blueste41 said:Only because it gives the media another stick to beat us with.
But if it meant we won the title, I would be happy to see 11 oompa-loompas run out for us!
Jones, Cleverley, Smalling, Rooney, Ferdinand?uwe rosler 28 said:Can anyone tell me a english outfield player that would have got in our team yesterday?
mr t said:I think we should have given Negredo a miss and brought in Peter Crouch
Silly question. Infinitely better than Silva.paulchapo said:Rooney is quality but is he better than Silva?
jimharri said:Silly question. Infinitely better than Silva.paulchapo said:Rooney is quality but is he better than Silva?
It's a no-brainer really, innit?nobody can eat fifty eggs said:He's miles better than Silva I would swap in an instant.
This, at least we didn't have englands number two in our goal.Dribble said:No.
England is England's problem not Manchester City's.
We don't really have any young players trying to get into the City first team.uncle b said:Not really but what does worry me a bit is we dont even have any of the young players trying to get in the England squad