quiet_riot
Well-Known Member
1.618034 said:Imagine if everyone who'd done the survey had ticked all boxes.. Then each option would have a 100% response rate.
25% surely? As 1 of every 4 votes went to each option. We'll agree to disagree :p
1.618034 said:Imagine if everyone who'd done the survey had ticked all boxes.. Then each option would have a 100% response rate.
quiet_riot said:1.618034 said:Imagine if everyone who'd done the survey had ticked all boxes.. Then each option would have a 100% response rate.
25% surely? As 1 of every 4 votes went to each option. We'll agree to disagree :p
Its good the club are trying new things I agree but if they don't like the results of the poll will they agree with the fans? We all voted for cheaper match day food and booze and we didn't get it and the club tries to justify the prices by bringing in Jamie's posh nosh.acton28 said:nobody can eat fifty eggs said:Manchester City ruining polls since 2008.
Firstly, fair play to the club and its digital media team for trying something innovative, something new and something above all - for the fans, for inclusion etc.
The poll looks suspect, but work in progress will need feedback to the club to turn it around.
If the digital banner gives a stage to a new talent, who passes on something worthy of future cult status then fair play!
Around every corner is a new Poznan.
[bigimg]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fc/Man_City_Fans_Doing_Poznan.jpg[/bigimg]
quiet_riot said:1.618034 said:Imagine if everyone who'd done the survey had ticked all boxes.. Then each option would have a 100% response rate.
25% surely? As 1 of every 4 votes went to each option. We'll agree to disagree :p
1.618034 said:quiet_riot said:1.618034 said:Imagine if everyone who'd done the survey had ticked all boxes.. Then each option would have a 100% response rate.
25% surely? As 1 of every 4 votes went to each option. We'll agree to disagree :p
I'm agreeing to nothing of the sort.
How can one option get 25% if everyone (100% of the people/ALL of them/The WHOLE) voted for everything.
Adding up the individual percentages, as i've said, is meaningless. But if you did, and everyone voted for all 4 options, then they would total 400%. 5 options = 500% etc.
If it had been a one option only poll then the totals would've added up to 100.
Oh and to the "lesson" above from shemnel... Don't give up the day-job.
Unless you're a maths teacher!
;-)
shemnel said:1.618034 said:quiet_riot said:25% surely? As 1 of every 4 votes went to each option. We'll agree to disagree :p
I'm agreeing to nothing of the sort.
How can one option get 25% if everyone (100% of the people/ALL of them/The WHOLE) voted for everything.
Adding up the individual percentages, as i've said, is meaningless. But if you did, and everyone voted for all 4 options, then they would total 400%. 5 options = 500% etc.
If it had been a one option only poll then the totals would've added up to 100.
Oh and to the "lesson" above from shemnel... Don't give up the day-job.
Unless you're a maths teacher!
;-)
i thoght it was quite good! not quite the Golden Ratio though...