Discuss Pellegrini....

Status
Not open for further replies.
PSmyth07 said:
The thing that I don't understand and especially from the media, is that this is MP's first season and this isn't his squad.

I'm sure that's the reason why he didn't rush to make any rash decisions in the January transfer market because he's still assessing the squads needs.

And look at the performances he's getting from a team that isn't really his, players like Nasri, Milner and Kolarov have come on loads already this season.

I can't wait until he gets his own team in.

No, it's because it's not his job. The manager doesn't sign the players; I'm sure he has his say but ultimately it's not his decision.
 
Re: Pellikeegan

didactic said:
bugsyblue said:
didactic said:
Yes he lost a game so he must go let's get Hughes back maybe Sven?

This sort of flip flopping is reminiscent of spoilt United fans expecting every game to be a win. Jose was lucky and we were poor not brain science not tactical genius just the rub if the green.

They hit the post 4 times! What fucking game were you watching!

And Dzeko and Yaya missed as well as Silva so are we converting non goals as being over whelmed?

They were the better team, yes or no? Personally, and taking into account we were at home, I thought we got battered
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
OB1 said:
Mister Appointment said:
Pellers will carry the can as manager, both in the press and on the forum. I pity Norwich. They will have tonight's result taken out on them.

Just had another look at the stats and our pass completion was 83% against their 73%; we also won 32 tackles compared to their 15 (but some people post that they wanted it more).
They didn't need to tackle as we usually gave them the ball without them having to bother. And most of those completed passes involved the back four and Hart I bet.

Our top four passers were the midfield players.
 
Re: Anti football vs Beautiful football....

dctid said:
cheddar404 said:
dctid said:
Thought Chelski were excellent did not see much anti football to be honest they were just far far more motivated better organised and were better drilled.

Seem to remember we did not take many prisoners and we were also more pragmatic when we won the title

They were time wasting from the first 5 minutes and strangled the life out of the game. Pulls would be proud.

Fuck me thats blinkered

Yep
We lost to the better team on the night.
We aren't shit.Neither is Pellegrini.
I'm fucking off to bed.
 
Just got back and I feel quite upbeat, although dosappointed. The absences of fernandinho and aguero were huge, and we had an unsolvable problem. - which has been on the cards all year- with fernandinho's injury. The only option was de Michelis which left nastasic as the only option at centre half. And his confidence is shot. They flooded the final third to stymy our creativity and did it well, but we were desperately unlucky not to go a goal or two up on the first 25 minutes before they settled. Then our heads went.

I thought clichy should have started, although kolorov was our best outlet first half . And I thought jovetic should have started, but to cut the manager some slack, I don't know how fit he is.

He changed the game because he gave us an extra body in the congested problem area but more than that, extra guile. In the second half we could easily have equalised - but easily conceded too.

Mourinho, the wily old ****, made the whole game about him, the media, the fans, even our own bloody fans fell for it and he came out of it looking like a genius. But I think pellegrini just suffered from one of those nights. With Sergio running at their back two, and fernandinho snapping around the back of our midfield, this would have been a different game.

One of those nights. We move on, get players back and carry on winning games. There was very little else pellegrini could have done to change tonight. Milner in central midfield? Maybe. Bit clearly the manager doesn't fancy him there as he doesn't keep possession very well.

There's a damn good reason we were trying to sign a centre half and a holding midfielder in January.
 
Re: Pellikeegan

bugsyblue said:
Davs 19 said:
bugsyblue said:
He's tactical inept. Great man manager but tactical very poor. I would say at least it's a wake up call before barca but we had a similar wake up call against bayern at home - changed the formation after 60 mins. Tonight should have changed it at half time.

Yep. 1st defeat in 21. He's really, really inept.

You don't just win games from tactics. He is a terrific man manager and gets the best out of the players. We were tactically outclassed tonight and anyone who knows anything about football would have brought on a midfielder for one of our strikers at half time - we were being over run.

Tonight may not have been his finest hour but the players have to take some responsibility. Last to every second ball and switched off alarmingly at times. Does that make Pellegrini tactically inept overall ? Not for me.
 
Re: Pellikeegan

bugsyblue said:
Davs 19 said:
bugsyblue said:
He's tactical inept. Great man manager but tactical very poor. I would say at least it's a wake up call before barca but we had a similar wake up call against bayern at home - changed the formation after 60 mins. Tonight should have changed it at half time.

Yep. 1st defeat in 21. He's really, really inept.

You don't just win games from tactics. He is a terrific man manager and gets the best out of the players. We were tactically outclassed tonight and anyone who knows anything about football would have brought on a midfielder for one of our strikers at half time - we were being over run.
Yep - you´ve got to have both and show a little more flexibility. If he really wants to be known as a winner he´s got to learn to make these calls.

Oh and as DD said Clichy should have started after his performance at WHL
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Just got back and I feel quite upbeat, although dosappointed. The absences of fernandinho and aguero were huge, and we had an unsolvable problem. - which has been on the cards all year- with fernandinho's injury. The only option was de Michelis which left nastasic as the only option at centre half. And his confidence is shot. They flooded the final third to stymy our creativity and did it well, but we were desperately unlucky not to go a goal or two up on the first 25 minutes before they settled. Then our heads went.

I thought clichy should have started, although kolorov was our best outlet first half . And I thought jovetic should have started, but to cut the manager some slack, I don't know how fit he is.

He changed the game because he gave us an extra body in the congested problem area but more than that, extra guile. In the second half we could easily have equalised - but easily conceded too.

Mourinho, the wily old ****, made the whole game about him, the media, the fans, even our own bloody fans fell for it and he came out of it looking like a genius. But I think pellegrini just suffered from one of those nights. With Sergio running at their back two, and fernandinho snapping around the back of our midfield, this would have been a different game.

One of those nights. We move on, get players back and carry on winning games. There was very little else pellegrini could have done to change tonight. Milner in central midfield? Maybe. Bit clearly the manager doesn't fancy him there as he doesn't keep possession very well.

There's a damn good reason we were trying to sign a centre half and a holding midfielder in January.

Summed up nicely.

I have a fear we didn't try hard enough to sign someone. We have been weak at CB and CM for some time, we get an injury and we can't cope.

Barca will beat us if Fernandinho isn't fit and he plays two up.
 
If we would have won tonight no one would moan, FFS this is our 1st loss since season started at home, that was August it is now Feb.

Facts

Arsenal have more injuries than us and struggled to break Palace down
Chelsea are still only level on pts

We play we 2 more league games before FA cup, it may be a different story in 2 weeks time.

It will go right to wire this so plenty more twists and turns
 
Just seen the presser.

Pelle thought we didn't deserve to lose.... thought he didn't do mind games.
 
Re: Pellikeegan

bugsyblue said:
Davs 19 said:
bugsyblue said:
He's tactical inept. Great man manager but tactical very poor. I would say at least it's a wake up call before barca but we had a similar wake up call against bayern at home - changed the formation after 60 mins. Tonight should have changed it at half time.

Yep. 1st defeat in 21. He's really, really inept.

You don't just win games from tactics. He is a terrific man manager and gets the best out of the players. We were tactically outclassed tonight and anyone who knows anything about football would have brought on a midfielder for one of our strikers at half time - we were being over run.

So overrun that Chelsea managed to achieve 35% possession.

I would have started with an extra midfielder but, if you are overrun, you do not go and achieve better than average possession.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Just got back and I feel quite upbeat, although dosappointed. The absences of fernandinho and aguero were huge, and we had an unsolvable problem. - which has been on the cards all year- with fernandinho's injury. The only option was de Michelis which left nastasic as the only option at centre half. And his confidence is shot. They flooded the final third to stymy our creativity and did it well, but we were desperately unlucky not to go a goal or two up on the first 25 minutes before they settled. Then our heads went.

I thought clichy should have started, although kolorov was our best outlet first half . And I thought jovetic should have started, but to cut the manager some slack, I don't know how fit he is.

He changed the game because he gave us an extra body in the congested problem area but more than that, extra guile. In the second half we could easily have equalised - but easily conceded too.

Mourinho, the wily old ****, made the whole game about him, the media, the fans, even our own bloody fans fell for it and he came out of it looking like a genius. But I think pellegrini just suffered from one of those nights. With Sergio running at their back two, and fernandinho snapping around the back of our midfield, this would have been a different game.

One of those nights. We move on, get players back and carry on winning games. There was very little else pellegrini could have done to change tonight. Milner in central midfield? Maybe. Bit clearly the manager doesn't fancy him there as he doesn't keep possession very well.

There's a damn good reason we were trying to sign a centre half and a holding midfielder in January.

Summed it for me there...
 
Balti said:
cookster said:
Gillespie said:
Pellegrini is a good manager

A great squad deserves a great manager. Is Pelle a great manager.....

look at the subs bench tonight

does he really have such a great squad?

Jesus wept

If you don't have such a great squad then God knows what that means for the rest of us mere mortals.
 
Re: Pellikeegan

Damocles said:
BillyShears said:
Hahahahahahahaha.

Such a myopic one eyed completely stupid post Blusterin' Bob could've written it.

I can see it's going to be a long long night.

Another nights ban.

I don't think people are taking me on here

Surely to God you are taking the piss if you've banned him for that?
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Just got back and I feel quite upbeat, although dosappointed. The absences of fernandinho and aguero were huge, and we had an unsolvable problem. - which has been on the cards all year- with fernandinho's injury. The only option was de Michelis which left nastasic as the only option at centre half. And his confidence is shot. They flooded the final third to stymy our creativity and did it well, but we were desperately unlucky not to go a goal or two up on the first 25 minutes before they settled. Then our heads went.

I thought clichy should have started, although kolorov was our best outlet first half . And I thought jovetic should have started, but to cut the manager some slack, I don't know how fit he is.

He changed the game because he gave us an extra body in the congested problem area but more than that, extra guile. In the second half we could easily have equalised - but easily conceded too.

Mourinho, the wily old ****, made the whole game about him, the media, the fans, even our own bloody fans fell for it and he came out of it looking like a genius. But I think pellegrini just suffered from one of those nights. With Sergio running at their back two, and fernandinho snapping around the back of our midfield, this would have been a different game.

One of those nights. We move on, get players back and carry on winning games. There was very little else pellegrini could have done to change tonight. Milner in central midfield? Maybe. Bit clearly the manager doesn't fancy him there as he doesn't keep possession very well.

There's a damn good reason we were trying to sign a centre half and a holding midfielder in January.

Agree with everything there. On Milner, I already posted that I do not think he would have won as much ball as MDM or retain possession as well as MDM. Milner might have covered more ground and might have played a creative pass or two but, all in all, I do not think he would have improved things one jot in the middle.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Just got back and I feel quite upbeat, although dosappointed. The absences of fernandinho and aguero were huge, and we had an unsolvable problem. - which has been on the cards all year- with fernandinho's injury. The only option was de Michelis which left nastasic as the only option at centre half. And his confidence is shot. They flooded the final third to stymy our creativity and did it well, but we were desperately unlucky not to go a goal or two up on the first 25 minutes before they settled. Then our heads went.

I thought clichy should have started, although kolorov was our best outlet first half . And I thought jovetic should have started, but to cut the manager some slack, I don't know how fit he is.

He changed the game because he gave us an extra body in the congested problem area but more than that, extra guile. In the second half we could easily have equalised - but easily conceded too.

Mourinho, the wily old ****, made the whole game about him, the media, the fans, even our own bloody fans fell for it and he came out of it looking like a genius. But I think pellegrini just suffered from one of those nights. With Sergio running at their back two, and fernandinho snapping around the back of our midfield, this would have been a different game.

One of those nights. We move on, get players back and carry on winning games. There was very little else pellegrini could have done to change tonight. Milner in central midfield? Maybe. Bit clearly the manager doesn't fancy him there as he doesn't keep possession very well.

There's a damn good reason we were trying to sign a centre half and a holding midfielder in January.

A Fernandinho injury is what i've been dreading.

Hopefully Jovetic can stay fit in Aguero's absense as he looks a top top player to me.
 
Re: Pellikeegan

Rammy Blue said:
Damocles said:
BillyShears said:
Hahahahahahahaha.

Such a myopic one eyed completely stupid post Blusterin' Bob could've written it.

I can see it's going to be a long long night.

Another nights ban.

I don't think people are taking me on here

Surely to God you are taking the piss if you've banned him for that?

Surely to God you aren't seeing that I'm banning posters tonight for having a pop at others instead of discussing the game, and having a pop?

He had a 6 hour ban, which was threatened numerous time beforehand. It's 6 hours for a guy who has been here for numerous years

Again, nobody is forcing you to post here if you don't like the moderation. I'm pissed off that you decided to make this public instead of a PM so now I have to reply in public. Any further comments can be Pm'ed to me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top