OB1
Well-Known Member
eversince 76 said:Wilf Wild 1937 said:cleavers said:Not if we WIN 4 out of the six, and have numerous others where we didn't even come close to giving away a 2-0 lead. Its about an attacking philosophy, and I will always prefer 3-2 or 4-2 having given a 2-0 lead away, to winning 1-0, but that's me.
The fact of it is 4 out of 6 games were won, and the aim of a football match is to win. In the other 2 we didn't lose. As I posted above, there were plenty of other games to pick to show your disappointment in performance.
Scoring more than the opposition is what football is all about, and of the 6 games we let a 2-0 lead slip, we did precisely that.
I bet you hated our final game in 2011/12, for me it was one of the greatest days of my life.
We weren't 2-0 in that game and yes for 93 minutes and 19 seconds I hated it as I'm sure you did.
I'm sure if we let a 2-0 lead slip against a really top side in a CL final we wouldn't turn it around, the momentum would be with
the opposition. We didn't put 6 games to bed at 2-0 this season. We had to start from scratch at 2-2 and try to win them a
second time. 4 times we did. In all cases it was unprofessional to put ourselves in that position. Shit happens occasionally
but 6 times?
I do take your point there have been plenty of other games where we've under performed and not got the result this season.
The first 3 months of 2015 being the worst period since Sparkless was the manager. The whole 2-0 thing is just one symptom
of a greater malaise. We've regressed this season. I can't believe how much interest I've got in the Arsenal v Sunderland match.
Why? Simple, I'm not confident we'll get a result against Southampton. In fact I'm never confident that we'll get a result against
anyone these days. Generally we do but after losing to Middlesborough, Newcastle's youth team and Burnley how can any of
us be confident about anything anymore? He has to go. Last season was great. Thanks for the memories but go.
As for winning by outscoring an opponent? Every day. The way we won the title last year easily beats Chelsea's performance, albeit they fully deserved to be champions this year and actually did play some nice attacking football.
For giving away 2-0 leads, people make too much an issue out of that. Like Cleavers says, it didn't cost us. And giving away 2-0 leads, or any lead for that matter, it's part of football especially when you want to play attacking and attractive football. You take a risk vs teams that play a more defensive style like Chelsea under Mourinho or like we often did under Mancini. I suppose it's another stat that certainly will be looked at over and over again by the managementteam. Same like the stat that we hardly seem to create anything from a corner or settpiece.
Not being confident is the life of a footballfan. There won't be many fans around who feels comfortable before a game starts, I myself have gained a lot of confidence over the last 5 years, but I never expect a guaranteed win or guaranteed silverware. And that is a good thing because a win taste so much nicer than when it's hardly a surprise or relieve anymore. Same with winningsilverware. Remember: it's about supporting your club, a win is just a bonus. And we do get a lot of bonusses lately don't we?
Finally the manager. If he is soleley judged on progression, yes maybe Pellegrini should be sacked. But that is not the case, nor was it the sole reason for Mancini to get his marching orders. What happened to give a manager time to build, to create a certain identity within the club. I'm not talking about Fergie or Wenger-likes, but what is 2 years? We changed managers for fun in the 80-90ies and it didn't took us anywhere. Khaldoon spoke about cycles, 3 or 4 years, depending on circumstances.
Pellegrini can be blamed, he's not perfect. Nor is Guardiola for that matter. But I expect the ones who judge him to look at all aspects: players missing due to injury or whatever reason, post WC-hangovers, FFP, difficult CL-draws, yes even playing teams at difficult moments (like when we played United when we were low on confidence and they were just the other way round, but look what happened since). It just wasn't our season, it happens. And yes, we had some shitgames as well. As we did when we won the title 11-12 and 13-14. Changing managers after two years or sooner is panicing short term policy imo. And if that happens, the ones who hired Pellegrini in the first place should be sacked as well. Obviously.
What I do want to see is Pellegrini staying on, maybe even get another year, and try and get in quality, not quantity. 2 or 3 players (Bale/Pogba/de Bruyne to name a trio) and 1 or 2 from the academy that are truly ready to compete for a season (Lopez, Denayer to name two).
No, what I want to see is our owner keep on building what he has been doing ever since he took over.
I tend to agree. Progress is not always linear. I do though think we need more than 3 players.