LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
I see Perry has crawled out from recording her shit songs.
I don’t think I am.Whoah. Mate, with all due respect, you are way fucking overthinking this.
Yes, it definitely is these days. Notably so. Especially if it went to a trial, which it must have done.
Sentences for rape have gone up enormously in the last couple of decades.
Funny thing is as well that Brand has drifted further and further right while Channel 4 are generally still a pretty centre-left org. The Times are a fairly centre-right paper while the most "left wing" thing Brand has ever done is... endorse centrist Ed Miliband eight years ago? Almost as if there's no real correlation to anything him or his followers are suggesting, lol.As with other media exposes (Weinstein, Saville, Epstein etc) it's taken a really long and concerted investigation in order to make it to the publication stage. C4/The Times would have been fully aware of the litigation risks from Brand had they not double and triple checked their sources and info. The fact that it's a supposedly right leaning newspaper and a supposedly left leaning broadcaster collaborating on the investigation was no doubt intended to rebuff any accusations of bias one way or another. Predictably Brand has tried to paint this as some sort of mainstream media conspiracy against him, but the truth is that a conspiracy can easily be unravelled by facts and evidence.
My sympathies with the victims, another case of helpless/impressionable women being coerced, forced even, into intimacy by a male with a high profile in the 'celebrity' world. Never underestimate the courage required - even under anonymity - to be able to come forward with these claims. No doubt many of these victims tried to convince themselves that there was something normal about what happened to them, maybe even blaming
themselves for what happened.
As for why not go to the police and that argument. We know how difficult it has been for our legal system to make charges of rape and sexual assault stick in the courts and going to the police means going public, fighting the case on your own against a person with a higher profile and much greater resources at their disposal. By going this way they can be protected with anonymity and as we have seen since the revelations first broke, it allows others to come forward, adding weight to the evidence and providing validation of their own experiences.
It’s scary that there are still people like you that clearly think pedo priests, noncy celebrities and bent coppers should be left to get on with their crimes until someone has enough faith in the system to report them at their local police station and the police take them seriously enough to launch an investigation.We live in the UK and freedom of speech, We should never condemn anybody out of a court of law until proven innocent or guilty,
We have to stop all this crap with the media and social media sites, We are not the judge or jury
Because somebody has made a claim in the media he's instantly found guilty,
I value people views on here, but when it comes to a media witch hunt and people believe it straight away and dare members to speak out that maybe something is not right here,
It is scary that in 2023 the people on social media sites are now a jury in a court of law
It’s not, why would you think it is? People directly involved rarely change their minds in online media discussions!
Doesn’t mean people reading it won’t though and there’s a plethora of people today (in general rather than on here) saying it should solely be down to the police and the CPS and I just think that’s fundamentally not true and am explaining why.
We live in the UK and freedom of speech, We should never condemn anybody out of a court of law until proven innocent or guilty,
We have to stop all this crap with the media and social media sites, We are not the judge or jury
Because somebody has made a claim in the media he's instantly found guilty,
I value people views on here, but when it comes to a media witch hunt and people believe it straight away and dare members to speak out that maybe something is not right here,
It is scary that in 2023 the people on social media sites are now a jury in a court of law
Is it a left to right shift, or has he merely become anti anything he perceives has more power than it should in his mind?Funny thing is as well that Brand has drifted further and further right while Channel 4 are generally still a pretty centre-left org. The Times are a fairly centre-right paper while the most "left wing" thing Brand has ever done is... endorse centrist Ed Miliband eight years ago? Almost as if there's no real correlation to anything him or his followers are suggesting, lol.