jimharri
Moderator
Good post.KippaxCitizen said:
Apart form the ''sound rags'' bit!
do we now understand the Rags point of view?
- Thread starter malg
- Start date
Apart form the ''sound rags'' bit!
Dr Mick
Well-Known Member
I’ve said all season that if City don’t win the league I’d like Liverpool to win it but after Sunday those classless, thieving, work dodging, bin dipping, scouse vermin with that famous scouse wit of theirs that has yet to be witnessed by a single person outside of Liverpool can go to f*ck.
We take out a full page advert in their programme showing our support for the victims of Hillsborough, we observe the minute’s silence impeccably, we even hold up a ‘YNWA’ banner and what do they do? Boo relentlessly every time we touch the ball, cheer uncontrollably when Yaya gets injured, dive and cheat throughout the entire 90 minutes then brick our coaches after the game and attack innocent City fans at Slime Street station. F*ck knows what would have happened if they’d have lost the game.
Not to mentioned their wannabe Martin McGuinness tribute act of a manager doing his best to incite violence with his hateful ‘unleash the full force of the crowd’ speech, and that street brawling, DJ battering, night club scuffling cry baby just because he’s beaten...er...Manchester City, the team that couldn't win a f*cking raffle for 36 years! Who the f*ck did he think he was playing, Brazil 1970?
Anyway if City can’t win it, come on Chelsea put those candle lighting c*nuts back in their place. You’d actually be doing them a favour as they just love wallowing in their own self pity anyway.
We take out a full page advert in their programme showing our support for the victims of Hillsborough, we observe the minute’s silence impeccably, we even hold up a ‘YNWA’ banner and what do they do? Boo relentlessly every time we touch the ball, cheer uncontrollably when Yaya gets injured, dive and cheat throughout the entire 90 minutes then brick our coaches after the game and attack innocent City fans at Slime Street station. F*ck knows what would have happened if they’d have lost the game.
Not to mentioned their wannabe Martin McGuinness tribute act of a manager doing his best to incite violence with his hateful ‘unleash the full force of the crowd’ speech, and that street brawling, DJ battering, night club scuffling cry baby just because he’s beaten...er...Manchester City, the team that couldn't win a f*cking raffle for 36 years! Who the f*ck did he think he was playing, Brazil 1970?
Anyway if City can’t win it, come on Chelsea put those candle lighting c*nuts back in their place. You’d actually be doing them a favour as they just love wallowing in their own self pity anyway.
hobbsisablue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 732
Dr Mick said:
Like it Dr Mick
I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,261
Don't underestimate how much of an entitled prick years of your team dominating football can make you. Especially when you take into account the fact that that's why most of their fans chose them in the first place.dan.j.mcfc said:
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Never forget.
FanchesterCity
Well-Known Member
I've refrained from commenting until now, but I've caved in...
Let's get a few facts in order, and put aside the rivaylry-
1) Liverpool were a tremendously successful team in the 70s and a fair part of the 80s. Their trophy haul was phenomenal, and thus they gained absolutely massive support all over the world (when TV was finally in every household and European nights were probably considered a lot more special). They achieved what we would like to achieve, and that (for us) will mean we gather more and more support from foreign lands too. Fans can't have it both ways.... if you want to be 'huge' you have to gather fans from outside of Manchester (and we have done, just not as many as Liverpool (yet))
2) What happened at Hillsborough COULD have been anybody. They had a large following, more so than many other clubs, and yes, of course they had their fair share of numpties (so do City and every other club in the land). It was an accident though. A whole bunch of seemingly minor factors contrived to create a large disaster - as is the nature of disasters. Even Duckinfield's ill-fated decision to open the gates was intended to help crown congestion. Sadly it didn't, it helped make it worse.
What the families of the 96 object to (and rightly so) isn't the mistakes that were made, but the attempt to hide those mistakes. Of course the mistakes needed to be illustrated, but it's the lies and coverup that came after that are appalling.
IF (God forbid) any of our families died in a tragedy like that, I'd like to think someone was still fighting the batter 25 years later to clear people's reputations and seek justice. Anybody who thinks 'it couldn't have happened to us' is wrong. The Taylor report should be read by EVERYONE to understand what happened that day, and they'll soon realise how many other stadiums had similar issues.
Hillsborough isn't about Liverpool fans, it's about football fans in general. On THAT day, it happened to be Liverpool fans who paid the price.
3) The cities of Manchester and Liverpool are inextricably intertwined and so similar. Anfield's an incredibly deprived area, and of course many of their fans are at the low end of the social spectrum. But so are many City fans. It's not a particularly attractive trait these days to be loud mouthed and aggressive at games, you just look a total dick, but we, like Liverpool, still have plenty in our ranks. Let's not kid ourselves that we are somehow better.
4) I too get irritated by many Liverpool fans who vehemently believe they are support a 'special' club. I've never believed City are 'special'. I just love them. They are MY team. But I've never believed we are more deserving or destined to be greater than anybody else. In fact, I think the vast majority of us don't know we're born.... try supporting Rochdale, or Bury, or Accrington Stanley for 50 years without a hope in hell of winning a thing. We are lucky, Liverpool fans are luckier still.
I don't like the way they refer to City as a 'small club', it's patronising.
BUT
There's so many on here that do precisely the same to other clubs that haven't been as fortunate as us. i.e. We do it too.
We got beat at the weekend by a fine Liverpool team. On another day it might have gone City's way. That's football. Maybe some decisions were iffy, but we've benefitted from iffy decisions in the past. We've won games we shouldn't have and lost games we should have won. Again, that's football.
The moment you start to refer to other fans as 'scouse ****' you lose any right to take offence at being called a 'manx ****'. It's futile and pathetic really, and we're supposed to be better than that aren't we?
And one final thing.... feel free to disagree if you must:
I wish WE would create an atmosphere like Anfield on Sunday. City's recent atmosphere has left a lot to be desired. It doesn't have to be aggressive, but a bit more support for our lads on the pitch might just make a difference. I think it helped Liverpool at the weekend, and we should be helping City with a lot more vocal support for the team rather than the moaning about petty rivalry.
Let's get a few facts in order, and put aside the rivaylry-
1) Liverpool were a tremendously successful team in the 70s and a fair part of the 80s. Their trophy haul was phenomenal, and thus they gained absolutely massive support all over the world (when TV was finally in every household and European nights were probably considered a lot more special). They achieved what we would like to achieve, and that (for us) will mean we gather more and more support from foreign lands too. Fans can't have it both ways.... if you want to be 'huge' you have to gather fans from outside of Manchester (and we have done, just not as many as Liverpool (yet))
2) What happened at Hillsborough COULD have been anybody. They had a large following, more so than many other clubs, and yes, of course they had their fair share of numpties (so do City and every other club in the land). It was an accident though. A whole bunch of seemingly minor factors contrived to create a large disaster - as is the nature of disasters. Even Duckinfield's ill-fated decision to open the gates was intended to help crown congestion. Sadly it didn't, it helped make it worse.
What the families of the 96 object to (and rightly so) isn't the mistakes that were made, but the attempt to hide those mistakes. Of course the mistakes needed to be illustrated, but it's the lies and coverup that came after that are appalling.
IF (God forbid) any of our families died in a tragedy like that, I'd like to think someone was still fighting the batter 25 years later to clear people's reputations and seek justice. Anybody who thinks 'it couldn't have happened to us' is wrong. The Taylor report should be read by EVERYONE to understand what happened that day, and they'll soon realise how many other stadiums had similar issues.
Hillsborough isn't about Liverpool fans, it's about football fans in general. On THAT day, it happened to be Liverpool fans who paid the price.
3) The cities of Manchester and Liverpool are inextricably intertwined and so similar. Anfield's an incredibly deprived area, and of course many of their fans are at the low end of the social spectrum. But so are many City fans. It's not a particularly attractive trait these days to be loud mouthed and aggressive at games, you just look a total dick, but we, like Liverpool, still have plenty in our ranks. Let's not kid ourselves that we are somehow better.
4) I too get irritated by many Liverpool fans who vehemently believe they are support a 'special' club. I've never believed City are 'special'. I just love them. They are MY team. But I've never believed we are more deserving or destined to be greater than anybody else. In fact, I think the vast majority of us don't know we're born.... try supporting Rochdale, or Bury, or Accrington Stanley for 50 years without a hope in hell of winning a thing. We are lucky, Liverpool fans are luckier still.
I don't like the way they refer to City as a 'small club', it's patronising.
BUT
There's so many on here that do precisely the same to other clubs that haven't been as fortunate as us. i.e. We do it too.
We got beat at the weekend by a fine Liverpool team. On another day it might have gone City's way. That's football. Maybe some decisions were iffy, but we've benefitted from iffy decisions in the past. We've won games we shouldn't have and lost games we should have won. Again, that's football.
The moment you start to refer to other fans as 'scouse ****' you lose any right to take offence at being called a 'manx ****'. It's futile and pathetic really, and we're supposed to be better than that aren't we?
And one final thing.... feel free to disagree if you must:
I wish WE would create an atmosphere like Anfield on Sunday. City's recent atmosphere has left a lot to be desired. It doesn't have to be aggressive, but a bit more support for our lads on the pitch might just make a difference. I think it helped Liverpool at the weekend, and we should be helping City with a lot more vocal support for the team rather than the moaning about petty rivalry.
mcmanus
Well-Known Member
Do I fuck.
The scousers have always been arrogant, horrible, our club is special type twats and in the last few weeks it's come to fore so incredibly.
United are just fucking cunts. Always have been always will.
So on my 22 point scale of most evil.
Giddy Scousers I mark at a score of 17.
United wankers for longevity I mark at a score of 22.
The scousers have always been arrogant, horrible, our club is special type twats and in the last few weeks it's come to fore so incredibly.
United are just fucking cunts. Always have been always will.
So on my 22 point scale of most evil.
Giddy Scousers I mark at a score of 17.
United wankers for longevity I mark at a score of 22.