Donald Trump

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Scarborough has an ego issue. I'm getting sick of his songs being plugged in his show.

I agree about Todd. He's almost BBC about it all.

Nicole Wallace rips him apart and Maddow, albeit great researcher and tells a great story monologue reaches climax anytime there's a chance he could become undone.

If I'm honest I do like the way Maddow gets exited about the news. At least you can see she actually cares, unlike Todd, who just looks like he could burst into tears at any moment.

I'd like to see Nicole Wallace take over on Meet the Press, but I'm not sure she'll get the chance any time soon.

 

[Bigga]

May I be the first to say "FUCK THAT GUY!!" in 2020 to Pres Orange?!

:)

 

[mat]

If I'm honest I do like the way Maddow gets exited about the news. At least you can see she actually cares, unlike Todd, who just looks like he could burst into tears at any moment.

I'd like to see Nicole Wallace take over on Meet the Press, but I'm not sure she'll get the chance any time soon.

I have a crush on Wallace. Something about her I can put put my finger on. Despite her being a republican.

:)

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

I have a crush on Wallace. Something about her I can put put my finger on. Despite her being a republican.

:)

Definitely something...….

 

[mat]

What does BBC about it all mean?

Old school BBC. As in the Paxman/Neill type of journalist.He tries to give the most balance on their roster. And not afraid to call out the bullshit of whoever he's interviewing.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

Explain what you mean by "unworkable".

You never explain what you mean beyond soundbites that work for you.

There is no need for explanation, as socialism has never worked.
Anywhere.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

Yeah but it’s like United are the most “supported club” in the UK.

That doesn’t mean they have more fans (viewers in this context) than the rest combined.

Mmm, maybe, but that argument also fits, and was used, by Conservative detractors in the British GE, add up
all the alternatives to them, and they shouldn't be in power, yet they are by a landslide . I'm not banging any drum for
Fox or anyone else, it's simply my view that Conservatives watch what chimes with their views, and unless PR is introduced
in the States, it follows that they, theoretically, have a greater chance of power.
I am not an avid follower, and don't have exact numbers to hand, so it may well be a different scenario over there.

 

[Bigga]

There is no need for explanation, as socialism has never worked.
Anywhere.

Here we go again.

I asked you what policies are "unworkable", you answer with your usual and predictable soundbite: 'socialism'.

And here's me thinking that you'd break down a policy you actually know about in some form of logical critique.

You never do, you never have done, you never will.

CLEARLY, you have no clue about what the Sanders regime would propose.

I happen to.

I kind of didn't want to do this so early in 2020, but I find it pointless talking to you.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

Here we go again.

I asked you what policies are "unworkable", you answer with your usual and predictable soundbite: 'socialism'.

And here's me thinking that you'd break down a policy you actually know about in some form of logical critique.

You never do, you never have done, you never will.

CLEARLY, you have no clue about what the Sanders regime would propose.

I happen to.

I kind of didn't want to do this so early in 2020, but I find it pointless talking to you.

I happen to believe that Sanders has about as much chance as Corbyn did, you were wrong in your analysis of
the British electorate then, and you are wrong about the American one now.
You're right, it is pointless, let's see who's right, after the election.

 

[Bigga]

I happen to believe that Sanders has about as much chance as Corbyn did, you were wrong in your analysis of
the British electorate then, and you are wrong about the American one now.
You're right, it is pointless, let's see who's right, after the election.

Gladly everyone can see you still fail to offer any shard of analysis on the error of ANY policy Sanders offers.

Because you don't know any. Bearing in mind, it's US politics with a different set of standards and opportunities lived by, it's fine, admit to it and back away from the conversation.

You offer the word 'socialism', that no one else does and you froth at the mouth.

You're a pseudo-intellectual, plain and simple, and I'm glad it's out there.

You look an absolute fool, right now.