Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been watched The Majority Report on YouTube, it's pretty good. they think Tom Cotton is gettign ready for 2024 - he seems like a nutcase so could be a perfect fit for them.....
The problem for the GOP in a post Trump world is what to do with his legacy - defend it or not. The base will want to defend it but that is probably not the way back in to power. They need another Regan type who was an acceptable face for more of the same. But Regan didn't have to defend Nixon as he had owned up to his mess and the fall out was largely contained within his circle. Regan was a fresh start. But how can you have a fresh start after Trump - so many of them are tainted and the fall out will go on and on.
 
Shame Beto O'Rourke didn't energise the voters...don't know a great deal about him but he looks like he knows what he's talking about.
 
I'm slowly clearing out old papers. I came across a piece I'd written (not sure now what for). It was just after Hungerford, and began with blurb for a "toy": "Rambo M60 Gun and Target set. Two guns in one. A machine gun sound and a rotating ammo belt. Set includes combat knife, Rambo headband and soft darts. No batteries are required." The whole piece was about societal acceptance of violence (and the MoD sending videos to schools to counter CND stuff by teaching kids about enmity), but it was this bit that leapt out. "Psychologists have strong evidence that a good proportion of those who have control of nuclear weapons exhibit some degree of instability. It may be the responsibility - as in Richard Nixon's calm statement, 'I can go into my office, pick up the telephone, and in half an hour fifty million people will be dead'. It may be the sense of power. But the question remains: do people go mad because they have such power, or do they seek such power because they are mad?"
 
Last edited:
I'm slowly clearing out old papers. I came across a piece I'd written (not sure now what for). It was just after Hungerford, and began with blurb for a "toy": "Rambo M60 Gun and Target set. Two guns in one. A machine gun sound and a rotating ammo belt. Set includes combat knife, Rambo headband and soft darts. No batteries are rqeuired." The whole piece was about societal acceptance of violence (and the MoD sending videos to schools to counter CND stuff by teaching kids about enmity), but it was this bit that leapt out. "Psychologists have strong evidence that a good proportion of those who have control of nuclear weapons exhibit some degree of instability. It may be the responsibility - as in Richard Nixon's calm statement, 'I can go into my office, pick up the telephone, and in half an hour fifty million people will be dead'. It may be the sense of power. But the question remains: do people go mad because they have such power, or do they seek such power because they are mad?"
Its alarming to think that it is 'possible' that Trump may not have been verbally briefed on the Russisn bounty Intel because they were fearful of a tantrum.

If they can't stand up to him over something like that, imagine if Trump decided to nuke N.Korea?

He's a rampant narcissist, and I also think he's batshit crazy enough to do it if he believed it would benefit him.

He was this way before, but now he has the opportunity I think it's made him worse.

Let's just hope his General's will stand up to him if it ever comes to the ultimate life or death decision.
 
The problem for the GOP in a post Trump world is what to do with his legacy - defend it or not. The base will want to defend it but that is probably not the way back in to power. They need another Regan type who was an acceptable face for more of the same. But Regan didn't have to defend Nixon as he had owned up to his mess and the fall out was largely contained within his circle. Regan was a fresh start. But how can you have a fresh start after Trump - so many of them are tainted and the fall out will go on and on.
With Carter as his running mate?
 
The problem for the GOP in a post Trump world is what to do with his legacy - defend it or not. The base will want to defend it but that is probably not the way back in to power. They need another Regan type who was an acceptable face for more of the same. But Regan didn't have to defend Nixon as he had owned up to his mess and the fall out was largely contained within his circle. Regan was a fresh start. But how can you have a fresh start after Trump - so many of them are tainted and the fall out will go on and on.
That's a good question, the GOP have really kicked themselves in the foot with their capitulation to the Orange idiot. Hard to believe there isn't/wasn't an inside coup waiting to pounce and run against him, he really doeas have the party locked down. I think a John Kasich and Nicki Haley ticket would do well
 
That's a good question, the GOP have really kicked themselves in the foot with their capitulation to the Orange idiot. Hard to believe there isn't/wasn't an inside coup waiting to pounce and run against him, he really doeas have the party locked down. I think a John Kasich and Nicki Haley ticket would do well

Haley has been angling for something but she isn't red meat for the red neck base. They would take Sarah Palin over her.

Trump will go to his grave insistent that everyone but him was corrupt and that he was the best POTUS of all time. 'Some people say better than Lincoln'. Him going to jail for corruption would not alter that and a good chunk of his voters will believe it whatever come out in the wash. So if you are the next GOP candidate you have to answer the question was Trump corrupt? There is no answer that doesn't piss of a huge block of your potential voters. Every GOP candidate in every type of election will have to face that issue, not sure which way they will go as a party.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.