mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
Somebody has to do the job and I was bored on the bus on the way home from work.I see you’ve noticed MSC hasn’t been in lately and feel the void needs to be filled. ;-)
Somebody has to do the job and I was bored on the bus on the way home from work.I see you’ve noticed MSC hasn’t been in lately and feel the void needs to be filled. ;-)
It’s obvious you have carefully studied his psyche and method.Somebody has to do the job and I was bored on the bus on the way home from work.
Pennsylvania could be the decider
Possibly?Harris and Trump running up the Rocky steps could be fun - first to the top wins.
Possibly fatal though in Trump's case.
I gave up a long time ago in here Seb.It’s obvious you have carefully studied his psyche and method.
I applaud your commitment to the role and your execution!
That's the way the "first past the post" system works, unfortunately. It's by no means fair. Look at the last election in the UK. From memory, Labour got, from memory, around 35-40% (?) of the vote, but got a massive majority of seats. The majority of people who bothered to vote, didn't vote for them. Are they worried about that? No, of course not. And you can't blame them. Same with the Republicans over yonder.It’s worth noting that even if Trump wins the election, it is likely that more people will have voted for Harris than for Trump (Republican presidential candidates have only won the popular vote once since 1988, and that was in 2004).
So I am not sure you could say America, as a whole, would deserve him.
Typical Harris supporter, making death threats and lowering the discourse ;-)I applaud your commitment to the role and your execution!
I’ve actually spoken about both the nature and implications of FPTP in the UK and the Republican’s reliance on the electoral college (and gerrymandering) in the US in various threads in the Politics Forum, so I know the debate well.That's the way the "first past the post" system works, unfortunately. It's by no means fair. Look at the last election in the UK. From memory, Labour got, from memory, around 35-40% (?) of the vote, but got a massive majority of seats. The majority of people who bothered to vote, didn't vote for them. Are they worried about that? No, of course not. And you can't blame them. Same with the Republicans over yonder.
Fair point.I’ve actually spoken about both the nature and implications of FPTP in the UK and the Republican’s reliance on the electoral college (and gerrymandering) in the US in various threads in the Politics Forum, so I know the debate well.
I was merely pointing out that I don’t think it is fair to say “America deserve Trump if he wins” when more people are likely to have voted for Harris than Trump regardless of the election result.
Yes, iirc in terms of actual votes cast starmers landslide win was not much better than the collapse under Corbyn in the previous GE.That's the way the "first past the post" system works, unfortunately. It's by no means fair. Look at the last election in the UK. From memory, Labour got, from memory, around 35-40% (?) of the vote, but got a massive majority of seats. The majority of people who bothered to vote, didn't vote for them. Are they worried about that? No, of course not. And you can't blame them. Same with the Republicans over yonder.