Donald Trump

Dax777 said:
Jack Smith has said he'll wrap up his investigation and resign.

By the way, if one were to be fair enough to consider the DOJ targeting Trump to be an attempt by Biden and the Democrats to target their opponents ( as many sensible people already do), it would make sense that Trump's appointees 1st job would be to rid the DOJ or partisans who spend their time and resources targeting and prosecuting their opponents.

So it shouldn't surprise anyone if the likes of Jack Smith, who has said he is resigning anyways, were fired

The real issue would be if Trump's DOJnnow begins to investigate and prosecute potential opponents of Trump... Then we'd have a real issue.

Granted, some of those who's joining us in our outcry when that happens were suspiciously nowhere to be found when the Biden DOJ was prosecuting his opposition the last 2 years.
Click to expand...
You dont seem to agree that Prosecuting someone who has committed crimes is a good thing.
 
FogBlueInSanFran said:
I think Dax is hurt because I don’t want to have a drink with him. I’m reminded of the scene toward the end of “Patton” :)
Click to expand...
I am Foggy. I mean outside of me making fun of Kaz, what did I do? You come across as such a nice guy. And yet here you are. hurting other people's feelings when you don't have to.


No nice!!
 
super_city_si said:
You dont seem to agree that Prosecuting someone who has committed crimes is a good thing.
Click to expand...
If you are prosecuting someone for the sole purpose of stopping them from challenging you, no.

But in fairness, you all agreed with this when you supported the impeachment of Trump for what you then mostly claimed was doing just that...

But who's counting.
 
Dax777 said:
If you are prosecuting someone for the sole purpose of stopping them from challenging you, no.

But in fairness, you all agreed with this when you supported the impeachment of Trump for what you then mostly claimed was doing just that...

But who's counting.
Click to expand...
Fuck me there’s a lot of false equivalency in there.
 
And so it begins. Buckle up lads and lassies. The biggest political fuck up, in the history of political fuck ups, and I should know, I’ve followed a few, is closer than two coats of paint.

Secretary of Defence? A For Fox Sake News **** who is batshit.

Attorney General? Goetz, and no, I’m not back on the glue.

What a fucking shambles of a country.
 
Dax777 said:
I am Foggy. I mean outside of me making fun of Kaz, what did I do? You come across as such a nice guy. And yet here you are. hurting other people's feelings when you don't have to.


No nice!!
Click to expand...
To be fair I took that post down. I am a nice guy. But let’s face it — I’m having a hard time understanding what set of circumstances would ever sway you from this man. Can’t really spend a lot of time with someone whose basic character you don’t understand.
 
FogBlueInSanFran said:
To be fair I took that post down. I am a nice guy. But let’s face it — I’m having a hard time understanding what set of circumstances would ever sway you from this man. Can’t really spend a lot of time with someone whose basic character you don’t understand.
Click to expand...
Fair enough.

I think your framing is is wrong. I'm not a Trumpist. But I like most of the team he has assembled.

And I am hopeful that they'll be successful. If he fails, or he is failing then I'll say so. But I'm not going to jump on some bandwagon hate-fest of predicting failure because you and some leftists here don't like him.

Let's take Matt Gaetz for example, how should I judge him? You and some here have insisted that he was credibly accused of child sex rape and trafficking.

I find that label jarring "credibly accuse." What does that mean exactly? A Biden DOJ investigated him and concluded they didn't have enough evidence to prosecute, talk less convict him. Did they just give him a pass? And if so, why? Isn't Biden's DoJ morally culpable if they have him a pass?

Look, Matt Gaetz has a punchable face. Looks like the kinda of guy I used to love to hate when you was in college. Oozes unwarranted
But is my bias based on his looks a legitimate basis for deeming accusations against him viable?

Why wasn't a case brought by the DOJ?. What deals were made? I need information. So I'm not convinced the accusations are enough. How am I sure this is not just political and a smear job?

My objections to Gaetz then can only come from his record. And there I don't see any depth in his profile. I cannot consider an unsubstantiated accusation in my evaluation. Yet so many here as the basid for their objection.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.