Donald Trump

[Dax777]

Well I’m not sure ‘Most people probably agree’ is reliable either.
In the interest of my own objectivity I just thought it needed pointing out that this is precisely the kind of statements I’ve seen you pull others up on, rather than counter the meet of an issue that they addressed with a’manner of speaking’, so to speak.

Sounds pedantic? Well it probably is.
Something else to bear in mind.

Fair Enough. Even though, I don't think that's what I do. Albeit I can see how you might come to that conclusion.

When I make Conclusory statements, I'm happy to expand on the claims. As I have clearly done in this thread.

The general thrust is that RFK has coockie views on vaccines. The evidence I've seen don't actually don't support that conclusion. At best he is suspicious of big government and big Pharma which are good things

And on a myriad of the issues he rants about, some of which I have summarized above, MOST people don't disagree.

Reduce processed chemicals in our foods
Employ More efficient farming practices
Eat less processed and more real food
Stop the Regulatory Agency to Pharmaceutical lobby pipeline.

Do you agree the above are all generally good things?

 

[Gareth Barry Conlon]

Fair Enough. Even though, I don't think that's what I do. Albeit I can see how you might come to that conclusion.

When I make Conclusory statements, I'm happy to expand on the claims. As I have clearly done in this thread.

The general thrust is that RFK has coockie views on vaccines. The evidence I've seen don't actually don't support that conclusion. At best he is suspicious of big government and big Pharma which are good things

And on a myriad of the issues he rants about, some of which I have summarized above, MOST people don't disagree.

Reduce processed chemicals in our foods
Employ More efficient farming practices
Eat less processed and more real food
Stop the Regulatory Agency to Pharmaceutical lobby pipeline.

Do you agree the above are all generally good things?

Re your list of things. He won't achieve any of that. It would require the house and Senate to pass bills and Trump to sign. The lobby groups will reach for the cash draw and brown envelopes and Trump will get the fatest one.

RFK has a history of promoting conspiracy BS. There is no doubt or ambiguity here. The stuff he believes is easily disproved and yet he choses that over scientific consensus, even after its pointed out to him he's wrong. He still pushes invermectin. Anyone like that is unfit for a low level job in that department. Let alone head it up.

 

[TinFoilHat]

What’s this about Russia congratulating Trump on his picks?

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Re your list of things. He won't achieve any of that. It would require the house and Senate to pass bills and Trump to sign. The lobby groups will reach for the cash draw and brown envelopes and Trump will get the fatest one.

RFK has a history of promoting conspiracy BS. There is no doubt or ambiguity here. The stuff he believes is easily disproved and yet he choses that over scientific consensus, even after its pointed out to him he's wrong. He still pushes invermectin. Anyone like that is unfit for a low level job in that department. Let alone head it up.

RFK Jr wouldn't even be fit to clean the toilets at the DoHHS. He is a fully paid up member of the antvaxer movement and definitely played a part in the deaths of people as a result of his rhetoric.

RFK Jr. spent years stoking fear and mistrust of vaccines. These people were hurt by his work

The book, called “Cause Unknown,” was co-published by an anti-vaccine group led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is now running for president.

apnews.com

 

[Dax777]

Re your list of things. He won't achieve any of that. It would require the house and Senate to pass bills and Trump to sign. The lobby groups will reach for the cash draw and brown envelopes and Trump will get the fatest one.

Fair enough. But if he could achieve any of them would you disagree with any of them? If not, then we are in agreement. If he could work on those things, I'd be totally fine and supportive.

RFK has a history of promoting conspiracy BS. There is no doubt or ambiguity here. The stuff he believes is easily disproved and yet he choses that over scientific consensus, even after its pointed out to him he's wrong. He still pushes invermectin. Anyone like that is unfit for a low level job in that department. Let alone head it up.

Well, that's not what I agree with him on.