BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 5,942
- Team supported
- Manchester City
No disagreement per se - hard to project how many deaths might have been prevented should HHS have adopted a stronger stance against potentially dangerous food additives though.Your current and previous HHS have killed. Millions by allowing the food & drugs industry to put whatever shite in food & allowed an opioid crisis . For example In the UK & EU McDonald's fries have 3 ingredients in the USA it has 17 !!! Orange Fanta has orange juice your version has none and is the colour of atomic piss , there are so many ingredients that are banned here that are considered cancer causing yet are allowed in the USA
My point, though, remains - however bad food additives are- just imagine how many will die when JFK Jr. blocks a COVID-MUTANT-26 (or some such) vaccine - to the extent that no vaccine is developed and is available in the USA.
JFK Jr. will be - should he be approved -in position to do the most harm, by far, to Americans and possibly the world (since in the face of a new pandemic, if no American company pursues a vaccine - who will?) - simply by being anti-vax. JFK Jr. is anti-science, anti-established practice - and that he may, by random happenstance, object to potentially dangerous food additives - doesn't change the fact that the guy is a know-nothing, conspiracy lunatic who has no business whatsoever being in charge of pre-school health education much less of the United States Health and Human Services.
Last edited: