Droylsden

EVIL

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 May 2005
Messages
177
Location
Audenshaw
I would imagine Dave is skinning the secretary's testicles with a potato peeler as we speak. Thats going to cost him a lot of prize money (£30,000).
 

Matty

Well-Known Member
Joined
24 May 2004
Messages
24,392
Location
This isn't Facebook, there will be no status updat
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/fa_cup/7799125.stm

If he was banned, and therefore ineligible, yet allowed to play, then Droylsden have fucked up royally. To be fair they've had a couple of reprieves anyway, they were gifted a goal in the 2-2 draw (there's no legal requirement for Chesterfield to allow them to score) and they 'conveniently' had floodlight failure whilst 2-0 down in the replay.
 

mat

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 May 2004
Messages
64,724
Location
Land of Make Believe
Matty said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/fa_cup/7799125.stm

If he was banned, and therefore ineligible, yet allowed to play, then Droylsden have fucked up royally. To be fair they've had a couple of reprieves anyway, they were gifted a goal in the 2-2 draw (there's no legal requirement for Chesterfield to allow them to score) and they 'conveniently' had floodlight failure whilst 2-0 down in the replay.


Sounds like a case of instant Karma.
 

EVIL

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 May 2005
Messages
177
Location
Audenshaw
This post from their forum seems to throw some light on what has happened.


More in importantly when the suspension was issued and confirmed only game which fell between the period was Vauxhall on the 26TH. It is my understanding that re-arranged fixtures have no bearing in terms of suspensions as we have seen teams have failed to move fixtures (Havent & Waterloo last season) in an attempt to get players unsuspended for a more important fixture.

When the suspension was communicated to the club, the only fixture falling in the period of suspension was a league game against Vauxhall Motors. A re-arranged fixture may not apply to the suspension period, and so Newton may have been eligible.
 

Zakyn

Member
Joined
31 Dec 2004
Messages
20
Location
Droylsden
EVIL said:
This post from their forum seems to throw some light on what has happened.


More in importantly when the suspension was issued and confirmed only game which fell between the period was Vauxhall on the 26TH. It is my understanding that re-arranged fixtures have no bearing in terms of suspensions as we have seen teams have failed to move fixtures (Havent & Waterloo last season) in an attempt to get players unsuspended for a more important fixture.

When the suspension was communicated to the club, the only fixture falling in the period of suspension was a league game against Vauxhall Motors. A re-arranged fixture may not apply to the suspension period, and so Newton may have been eligible.


Lets hope that this is true!
 

dom

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 May 2004
Messages
5,872
Location
chorlton
Well done the Bloods !!!

Worked at Littlemoss High School for a couple of years (drolysden's boys') for the rest of you.. One or 2 lads were plying with the club. Used to meet colleagues at The Butcher's

get in lads and good luck against Ipswich.
 

Don't have an account?

Register now!
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.