eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
no one ever said it was gonna be Eze
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Eberechi Eze
- Thread starter Don Karleone
- Start date
Mancityphilfo2000
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2021
- Messages
- 277
- Team supported
- City
It's never been Eze and never will be Eze.no one ever said it was gonna be Eze
Not necessairly. City would probably rather pay over the RC and structure the payments how we want.
How would this benefit us though? I don't think cashflow is a problem for a club of our means so why would choose to pay more?
Lionel Richie disagreesno one ever said it was gonna be Eze
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 12,954
Can be lots of reasons, its always going to be beneficial to spend 10m a year for 4 years instead of 40m up front if the other party agrees but with Eze we probably would want to put significant clauses for winning trophies and appearences etc.How would this benefit us though? I don't think cashflow is a problem for a club of our means so why would choose to pay more?
Semper aggressus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Sep 2019
- Messages
- 6,604
- Team supported
- Manchester City
We didn’t really need another winger though, even with Bobb out for a few months. Savinho, Doku, Grealish and Bernie all cover that position well. It’s central midfield we need to strengthen, and/or striker so Erling doesn’t have to play about 65 games.
It's a bigger indicator than any "gossip" columnist can come up with, money talks. Watch the betting markets on horse racing and the gambles landed when a horse is backed at big odds and prevails at far shorter ones, you may not pay attention to it but there's validity in these posts.Ffs why do people continue to post these ridiculous odds posts?
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
It's a bigger indicator than any "gossip" columnist can come up with, money talks. Watch the betting markets on horse racing and the gambles landed when a horse is backed at big odds and prevails at far shorter ones, you may not pay attention to it but there's validity in these posts.
Utter nonsense that sorry mate.
It's not, as someone who worked in the gambling industry for 30 years, and in the Office where odds were compiled and amended I can tell you categorically money talks. We used to have Race Horse Trainers, Sportsmen and Celebrities bet with us on their credit accounts. Chunky money sometimes that wasn't always accepted at the odds advertised, the alarm bells rang, odds shortened and liabilities managed.Utter nonsense that sorry mate.
I made a good few quid supplementing my income by following the "money in the know".