Eberechi Eze

[Woody135]

Who is available? Please do elaborate.

Everyone is available in europe if you stick £90-100m in their face

 

[Nails]

Everyone is available in europe if you stick £90-100m in their face

Thanks for that illuminating insight. Be sure to mention that to Txiki when next you speak.

 

[Charlesfarsbar]

Never understand posts like this. If he's a good buy, he's a good buy.

It’s all about risk, he’s a good buy at £40m as the financial risk is low if he turns out to be a dud and can’t make the step up eg Phillips

at This stage of the transfer window, we are at our fourth choice option , why spend £90m on a player that is a gamble

 

[Semper aggressus]

He did stand out last season for Palace, and some players are later developers in terms of starting to look too quality. Grealish didn’t look amazing at 21 did he. I think we’ll have scouted Eze for some time and Pep has obviously seen aspects to his game that he likes and no doubt can improve.

We need to increase our squad size with proven PL quality, that’s exactly what Eze will do. We should be getting behind this lad and excited to see what he can bring to our team. Fee is irrelevant, that’s the market this year, pretty sure the club won’t suddenly find we can’t afford it, we’re run much better than that.

Eze and Doku will prove to be pretty astute signings I reckon.

 

[Roachy]

I don't really,I want players that make us better tha'ts my only concern.If the club decide they pay 40mill 50 mill 70 mill for any player is down to them and the money men not my concern. Only what he brings to the team.

Completely understand that and agree. I honestly think though, every fan at some point has said or thought "crikey, that's a bit much" or "what a bargain". But yes, in reality it's what the club feels is a relevant fee to pay for a player.

 

[mosssideblue]

It’s all about risk, he’s a good buy at £40m as the financial risk is low if he turns out to be a dud and can’t make the step up eg Phillips

at This stage of the transfer window, we are at our fourth choice option , why spend £90m on a player that is a gamble

Not a risk you or I need to worry about. Will he improve us is the only question imo

 

[pauls]

Never understand posts like this. If he's a good buy, he's a good buy.

Chelski and Saudi have vastly inflated the market so if we're prepared to go to 80 for Paqueta don't see any issues going to 90 for Eze.All hearsay at the moment with a 9day poker tournament now playing out in the media and with our recent achievements the club deserve our trust,we're not purchasing a 31 year old for 70million.

 

[mosssideblue]

Chelski and Saudi have vastly inflated the market so if we're prepared to go to 80 for Paqueta don't see any issues going to 90 for Eze.All hearsay at the moment with a 9day poker tournament now playing out in the media and with our recent achievements the club deserve our trust,we're not purchasing a 31 year old for 70million.

I just think some posters need something to moan about. If it's not the player, it's the cost .

 

[Asa's left peg]

We shall know, soon enough

 

[Blue and true]

It looks like, thankfully, this is just bullshit. Nobody with any credibility reporting this yet.

Take £120mil to Leverkusen for their wunderkind and they'll sit down and listen.