Eberechi Eze

It looks like, thankfully, this is just bullshit. Nobody with any credibility reporting this yet.

Take £120mil to Leverkusen for their wunderkind and they'll sit down and listen.
Or they won't, or maybe even we don't even want him and think the Crytal Palace player is better than the Leverkusen player.
 
It looks like, thankfully, this is just bullshit. Nobody with any credibility reporting this yet.

Take £120mil to Leverkusen for their wunderkind and they'll sit down and listen.
Reports this morning that Wirtz, Barella, and Olmo are all not for sale this summer. We have inquired. After Bellingham, Rice, and Paqueta, that would make Eze our 7th choice ;). Common sense will most likely prevail, and we will go into the season with what we have and re-evaluate in January.
 
Thanks for that illuminating insight. Be sure to mention that to Txiki when next you speak.
Turns out having a negative view on a potential transfer is worthy of ridicule this morning.
Cheers blue
£100m gets you: Barella; Valverde; Wirtz; de Jong etc
Yes you need to convince them but that would be the fee
Dont put Eze in the same group
 
Reports this morning that Wirtz, Barella, and Olmo are all not for sale this summer. We have inquired. After Bellingham, Rice, and Paqueta, that would make Eze our 7th choice ;). Common sense will most likely prevail, and we will go into the season with what we have and re-evaluate in January.
We know if the right person isn't available we won't buy. I'm okay with that,
 
Reports this morning that Wirtz, Barella, and Olmo are all not for sale this summer. We have inquired. After Bellingham, Rice, and Paqueta, that would make Eze our 7th choice ;). Common sense will most likely prevail, and we will go into the season with what we have and re-evaluate in January.
I hope you're right mate. We need midfield reinforcements but we can do a damn sight better than Eze for the money we have available.
 
Not a risk you or I need to worry about. Will he improve us is the only question imo
Ahh but it is , the more we spend on players that don’t make the grade , the less we have on players that potentially will

the higher volume of quality players we have will dictate the probability of our future success

we‘ve got this balance more or less perfect in the past with one or two exceptions
 
Ahh but it is , the more we spend on players that don’t make the grade , the less we have on players that potentially will

the higher volume of quality players we have will dictate the probability of our future success

we‘ve got this balance more or less perfect in the past with one or two exceptions
we wont agree. We place a value on a player after doing all due dilligence. We pay bean counters huge amounts of money to manage the finacial risk. Leave them to it and leave fans to discuss whether this guy brings value on the field
 
Ahh but it is , the more we spend on players that don’t make the grade , the less we have on players that potentially will

the higher volume of quality players we have will dictate the probability of our future success

we‘ve got this balance more or less perfect in the past with one or two exceptions
We'd only need to worry about it if we thought our people were negligent or reckless, they aren't so no need for us as fans to worry ourselves.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.