blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 33,418
Early morning, misread you post :)Yes that’s my point, Eze looks a great fit from his analysis
Early morning, misread you post :)Yes that’s my point, Eze looks a great fit from his analysis
You said "good buy" which clearly means price.Fans should consider what the player adds to the team, not the bank balance and, if as the poster I replied to thinks he is good enough, then price is imaterial.
Not really we aren't paying for players we can only think or not think a player will be good for the team. Up to the club to decide if they want to pay any fee.You said "good buy" which clearly means price.
Not got a clue what that first sentence means. The second one reinforced my point. The club will pay what it feels a player is worth. If not they walk away. That clearly illustrates the price is material. My other point is that you, me and everyone else will have thoughts on what players are worth. We may have different opinions, but we all have them.Not really we aren't paying for players we can only think or not think a player will be good for the team. Up to the club to decide if they want to pay any fee.
I don't really,I want players that make us better tha'ts my only concern.If the club decide they pay 40mill 50 mill 70 mill for any player is down to them and the money men not my concern. Only what he brings to the team.Not got a clue what that first sentence means. The second one reinforced my point. The club will pay what it feels a player is worth. If not they walk away. That clearly illustrates the price is material. My other point is that you, me and everyone else will have thoughts on what players are worth. We may have different opinions, but we all have them.
Who is available? Please do elaborate.Signing Eze feels all too similar to signing Phillips for me. Underwhelming.
Mid 20s 1 club player.
No experience of playing a possession based system and hence absolute shot in the dark if he can adapt.
No european experience.
1 good notable season when no one cared for him before that.
To accept all that and still splash 80/90 million is baffling to me
I dont care what the market is or what other clubs are spending. Theyre only spending that buying from other prem clubs. If you can target from europe you can still get value.
A similar fee gets a younger more experienced better alternative from germany italy or spain.
We’re not short on english players so go and get the best europe can offer not south london.
He played for QPR b4 Palace.Signing Eze feels all too similar to signing Phillips for me. Underwhelming.
Mid 20s 1 club player.
No experience of playing a possession based system and hence absolute shot in the dark if he can adapt.
No european experience.
1 good notable season when no one cared for him before that.
To accept all that and still splash 80/90 million is baffling to me
I dont care what the market is or what other clubs are spending. Theyre only spending that buying from other prem clubs. If you can target from europe you can still get value.
A similar fee gets a younger more experienced better alternative from germany italy or spain.
We’re not short on english players so go and get the best europe can offer not south london.
Everyone is available in europe if you stick £90-100m in their faceWho is available? Please do elaborate.
Thanks for that illuminating insight. Be sure to mention that to Txiki when next you speak.Everyone is available in europe if you stick £90-100m in their face
It’s all about risk, he’s a good buy at £40m as the financial risk is low if he turns out to be a dud and can’t make the step up eg PhillipsNever understand posts like this. If he's a good buy, he's a good buy.
Completely understand that and agree. I honestly think though, every fan at some point has said or thought "crikey, that's a bit much" or "what a bargain". But yes, in reality it's what the club feels is a relevant fee to pay for a player.I don't really,I want players that make us better tha'ts my only concern.If the club decide they pay 40mill 50 mill 70 mill for any player is down to them and the money men not my concern. Only what he brings to the team.
Not a risk you or I need to worry about. Will he improve us is the only question imoIt’s all about risk, he’s a good buy at £40m as the financial risk is low if he turns out to be a dud and can’t make the step up eg Phillips
at This stage of the transfer window, we are at our fourth choice option , why spend £90m on a player that is a gamble
Chelski and Saudi have vastly inflated the market so if we're prepared to go to 80 for Paqueta don't see any issues going to 90 for Eze.All hearsay at the moment with a 9day poker tournament now playing out in the media and with our recent achievements the club deserve our trust,we're not purchasing a 31 year old for 70million.Never understand posts like this. If he's a good buy, he's a good buy.
I just think some posters need something to moan about. If it's not the player, it's the cost .Chelski and Saudi have vastly inflated the market so if we're prepared to go to 80 for Paqueta don't see any issues going to 90 for Eze.All hearsay at the moment with a 9day poker tournament now playing out in the media and with our recent achievements the club deserve our trust,we're not purchasing a 31 year old for 70million.