SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,068
Then to make a claim that it's true is just bullshit.The perfect fumble said:SWP's back said:I don't know how to break this down in any simpler form for you.The perfect fumble said:It's there to be knocked down, do it or shut up.
If you make a claim, and an outlandish claim at that, it is up to you to provide a link or source or any evidence of any kind to back that up, otherwise it's just bullshit.
As an example I spent last night enjoying a threesome with Megan Fox and the doly bird off Countdown.
Prove I didnt.
I don't care, nor do I suspect there is evidence to prove it one way or another.
There is plenty of evidence of out of control bonuses, rampant executive pay, failed executives awarding themselves golden handshakes and share holder revolts over executive pay.
I don't have to prove the sun rises in the morning by the same token I don't have to prove the existence of excessive executive remuneration, it's for you to disprove it.
It is called refutation, your opponent makes a point (me) and you refute it, if you don't, it stands.
That is why when the Tories make a point, Labour refutes it, if they don't or the refutation is weak, then the Tory statement stands.
And to your notion about not proving the sun rises in the morning, well no. But that's because it is freely available to be seen. But the reason why it rises and the theory of heliocentricity was proven, using evidence by Copernicus. You see, as I stated, that's the way it works.
But I suspect, judging by your last two paragraphs that you're just a fucking idiot.