Eden Hazard (continued)

[Crescent]

His Wikipedia page says "current club Manchester United" I have print screened and saved just in case this doesn't come to fruition.

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

Tolmie, we read a lot about the english clubs concerned. Does that mean that we can disgard the interest of Real Madrid in persuing him for the time being?

Don't see a spot for him at Madrid with Di Maria, Ronaldo et al.

Won't stop his agents trying to float the possibility, I'm sure!

 

[Jack the lad CTID]

His Wikipedia page says "current club Manchester United" I have print screened and saved just in case this doesn't come to fruition.

I wasn't using Wikipedia to say that he must be a united player now. My point was it shows some rags arrogance to put it up on there and will be a good picture to have saved if he signs for us instead to wind them up further.

 

[SWP's back]

The recent accounts released bythe Rags showed that their cash reserve had fallen to £20m. In order for them to buy players they would have to:

a) Rely on a cash injection from Uncle Malcolm - Not likely to happen.
b) Go further into debt - Can't see UM wanting to do this as they are making inroads into the debt and they wouldn't want to go backwards.
c) Partially Float on a Far East stock market -Tried this and there was insufficient interest so they didn't pursue it.
d) Sell players - Only Rooney would have a significant transfer value to enable them to rebuild to the extent that they require. If they did do this then the loss of Rooney would surely outweigh the positives of new signings

All this raises the question that if they are in for Hazard + other targets, where is the cash coming from?

I reckon we can pretty much rule them out a bidding war with us (or Chelsea, RM & Barca) for any of our targets. So the the gap is going to widen further.

disagree with point d) fella

Berbatov is still worth 8-10 million
Nani is worth even more hes only 25 years of age
Carrick is still worth similar to Berbatov

they can raise the money fella, Dont underestimate them twats-wages are another thing though and how the transfer is paid could tip it our way.

8-10m for Berba? A 31 year old with no contract (or is it 12 months left). no chance.

Carricks not going anywhere.

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

The recent accounts released bythe Rags showed that their cash reserve had fallen to £20m. In order for them to buy players they would have to:

a) Rely on a cash injection from Uncle Malcolm - Not likely to happen.
b) Go further into debt - Can't see UM wanting to do this as they are making inroads into the debt and they wouldn't want to go backwards.
c) Partially Float on a Far East stock market -Tried this and there was insufficient interest so they didn't pursue it.
d) Sell players - Only Rooney would have a significant transfer value to enable them to rebuild to the extent that they require. If they did do this then the loss of Rooney would surely outweigh the positives of new signings

All this raises the question that if they are in for Hazard + other targets, where is the cash coming from?

I reckon we can pretty much rule them out a bidding war with us (or Chelsea, RM & Barca) for any of our targets. So the the gap is going to widen further.

disagree with point d) fella

Berbatov is still worth 8-10 million
Nani is worth even more hes only 25 years of age
Carrick is still worth similar to Berbatov

they can raise the money fella, Dont underestimate them twats-wages are another thing though and how the transfer is paid could tip it our way.

United are already £450m plus in debt, another £30m won't rock the boat, albeit, coupled with wages, fees etc, you can maybe double or triple it.

United have this uncanny knack of getting top dollar for average players.

Last year, they created wiggle in the wages due to the retirements of Van der Sar and Neville.

Berbatov is one of the highest-paid players at the club and if he is sold between now and June 4th, I think we might have our answer where they can possibly generate the wages from.

They have already clawed back Owen's wages, although they have new deals for Giggs, Scholes, Welbeck.

United still have a cash flow and seaon ticket money to come in.

Much as i admire our stance, this is one of the few times when City need to blow every **** out of the water, wipe our eye.

Regardless of what we are paying him, even if we have got him to bend, he will still be earning £200a week according to all 'informed' reports.

 

[Latics Fan SJK]

The recent accounts released bythe Rags showed that their cash reserve had fallen to £20m. In order for them to buy players they would have to:

a) Rely on a cash injection from Uncle Malcolm - Not likely to happen.
b) Go further into debt - Can't see UM wanting to do this as they are making inroads into the debt and they wouldn't want to go backwards.
c) Partially Float on a Far East stock market -Tried this and there was insufficient interest so they didn't pursue it.
d) Sell players - Only Rooney would have a significant transfer value to enable them to rebuild to the extent that they require. If they did do this then the loss of Rooney would surely outweigh the positives of new signings

All this raises the question that if they are in for Hazard + other targets, where is the cash coming from?

I reckon we can pretty much rule them out a bidding war with us (or Chelsea, RM & Barca) for any of our targets. So the the gap is going to widen further.

disagree with point d) fella

Berbatov is still worth 8-10 million
Nani is worth even more hes only 25 years of age
Carrick is still worth similar to Berbatov

they can raise the money fella, Dont underestimate them twats-wages are another thing though and how the transfer is paid could tip it our way.

8-10m for Berba? A 31 year old with no contract (or is it 12 months left). no chance.

Carricks not going anywhere.

It wouldn't surprise me at all to see Berba go for around £8m.

 

[Crescent]

His Wikipedia page says "current club Manchester United" I have print screened and saved just in case this doesn't come to fruition.

I wasn't using Wikipedia to say that he must be a united player now. My point was it shows some rags arrogance to put it up on there and will be a good picture to have saved if he signs for us instead to wind them up further.

Oh, sorry about that mate.

 

[richards30]

The recent accounts released bythe Rags showed that their cash reserve had fallen to £20m. In order for them to buy players they would have to:

a) Rely on a cash injection from Uncle Malcolm - Not likely to happen.
b) Go further into debt - Can't see UM wanting to do this as they are making inroads into the debt and they wouldn't want to go backwards.
c) Partially Float on a Far East stock market -Tried this and there was insufficient interest so they didn't pursue it.
d) Sell players - Only Rooney would have a significant transfer value to enable them to rebuild to the extent that they require. If they did do this then the loss of Rooney would surely outweigh the positives of new signings

All this raises the question that if they are in for Hazard + other targets, where is the cash coming from?

I reckon we can pretty much rule them out a bidding war with us (or Chelsea, RM & Barca) for any of our targets. So the the gap is going to widen further.

disagree with point d) fella

Berbatov is still worth 8-10 million
Nani is worth even more hes only 25 years of age
Carrick is still worth similar to Berbatov

they can raise the money fella, Dont underestimate them twats-wages are another thing though and how the transfer is paid could tip it our way.

United are already £450m plus in debt, another £30m won't rock the boat, albeit, coupled with wages, fees etc, you can maybe double or triple it.

United have this uncanny knack of getting top dollar for average players.

Last year, they created wiggle in the wages due to the retirements of Van der Sar and Neville.

Berbatov is one of the highest-paid players at the club and if he is sold between now and June 4th, I think we might have our answer where they can possibly generate the wages from.

They have already clawed back Owen's wages, although they have new deals for Giggs, Scholes, Welbeck.

United still have a cash flow and seaon ticket money to come in.

Much as i admire our stance, this is one of the few times when City need to blow every **** out of the water, wipe our eye.

Regardless of what we are paying him, even if we have got him to bend, he will still be earning £200a week according to all 'informed' reports.

i agrre mate! we`re looking for the next world superstars that can stay and grow together for years to come then we just have to grab hazard!! we`ll surely be shedding a huge amount of the wage bill this summer so i think we have to flex the money muscles and get hazard!

 

[MSP]

His Wikipedia page says "current club Manchester United" I have print screened and saved just in case this doesn't come to fruition.

I wasn't using Wikipedia to say that he must be a united player now. My point was it shows some rags arrogance to put it up on there and will be a good picture to have saved if he signs for us instead to wind them up further.

Last night his current team on Belgium national team page was "whore" for few minutes

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

disagree with point d) fella

Berbatov is still worth 8-10 million
Nani is worth even more hes only 25 years of age
Carrick is still worth similar to Berbatov

they can raise the money fella, Dont underestimate them twats-wages are another thing though and how the transfer is paid could tip it our way.

United are already £450m plus in debt, another £30m won't rock the boat, albeit, coupled with wages, fees etc, you can maybe double or triple it.

United have this uncanny knack of getting top dollar for average players.

Last year, they created wiggle in the wages due to the retirements of Van der Sar and Neville.

Berbatov is one of the highest-paid players at the club and if he is sold between now and June 4th, I think we might have our answer where they can possibly generate the wages from.

They have already clawed back Owen's wages, although they have new deals for Giggs, Scholes, Welbeck.

United still have a cash flow and seaon ticket money to come in.

Much as i admire our stance, this is one of the few times when City need to blow every **** out of the water, wipe our eye.

Regardless of what we are paying him, even if we have got him to bend, he will still be earning £200a week according to all 'informed' reports.

i agrre mate! we`re looking for the next world superstars that can stay and grow together for years to come then we just have to grab hazard!! we`ll surely be shedding a huge amount of the wage bill this summer so i think we have to flex the money muscles and get hazard!

It would be a huge mistake to not break further hearts and underline our new status as champions of England.