Eden Hazard (continued)

[Anonymous]

All very logical. Apart from the fact he will win no trophies which is what he claims he wants.

They finished at least 8 wins off the title last season. Yes they won the champions league but the man who almost single handedly won them that trophy is leaving, and their other best players, cole lampard and terry are all the wrong side of 30. They change manager every season. They don't even have a manager at present. And does anybody actually believe that Guardiola will take a job under Abramovic?

I wish Hazard luck in challenging for 3rd place next season.

Chelsea are gonna go on a huge spending spree probably with hazard, modric, hulk and possibly Falcoa how do you know that their not gonna win anything. People this year said that chelsea were old and werent gonna win anything, but hey ho they won the champions league. Cant blame him if he wants to join chelsea

How will they keep all those happy. Bearing in mind Hazard and Torres will have to start.

you could the same about our team how do we keep all of our players happy ?

 

[ellguitar]

stop getting wound up - means nigel can break his leg in community shield. cant wait.

i know nigel is a good lad, but imagine...

 

[Khanvict]

Best team in the country
Belgian captain
Also a French speaking contingent Nasri/Clichy/Yaya
A MANAGER

Do you think Hazard would choose the best team in the country or the best team in Europe? City at this point have more potential for greatness than Chelsea but maybe Roman will spend on several big names this offseason. Chelsea also have other Belgian players like Lukaku (who is closer to Hazard's age than Kompany anyway). Ironically enough, I thought Hazard would have been turned off from Chelsea after seeing Lukaku's lack of playing time. Also, I thought Di Matteo was going to be given a 1-year trial? Even if he isn't, Chelsea will still get a good enough manager.

If Chelsea are the best team in Europe im a ginger spaceman from Jupiter. The won the title but they are not the best in Europe. What has Lukaku's age got to do with Hazard. Lukaku will be off somewhere all next season anyway

Well then I guess you must officially be the ginger spaceman from Jupiter because Chelsea officially are Europe's Champions. Maybe Hazard and Lukaku have a better relationship with each other because they hang out during the Belgian NT meets? Who knows? Like I said, I thought that Lukaku's situation at Chelsea would have caused Hazard to lean away from them.

 

[thenabster]

I feel bad for Kevin de Bruyne now. With Hazard in he would never play, NEVER except if Hazard is injured or anything. They are both the same age and Hazard like Torres are presidential toys so they have to play.

 

[edwrdhor]

Saha backtracks on his suggestion that hazard has chosen chelsea ahead of city or utd. BBC website 1453

 

[BoyBlue_1985]

Do you think Hazard would choose the best team in the country or the best team in Europe? City at this point have more potential for greatness than Chelsea but maybe Roman will spend on several big names this offseason. Chelsea also have other Belgian players like Lukaku (who is closer to Hazard's age than Kompany anyway). Ironically enough, I thought Hazard would have been turned off from Chelsea after seeing Lukaku's lack of playing time. Also, I thought Di Matteo was going to be given a 1-year trial? Even if he isn't, Chelsea will still get a good enough manager.

I stopped readind after your first line... "BEST TEAM IN EUROPE" hahahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Do you think Hazard would choose the best team in the country or the best team in Europe? City at this point have more potential for greatness than Chelsea but maybe Roman will spend on several big names this offseason. Chelsea also have other Belgian players like Lukaku (who is closer to Hazard's age than Kompany anyway). Ironically enough, I thought Hazard would have been turned off from Chelsea after seeing Lukaku's lack of playing time. Also, I thought Di Matteo was going to be given a 1-year trial? Even if he isn't, Chelsea will still get a good enough manager.

BEST TEAM IN EUROPE? Since when are Barca or Real in for him?

Jog on funny man.

Seems crazy, right? But the player you so badly wanted seems to have made his decision for that reason. And Man City could have easily lost to (10-man) QPR that day. Don't get so full of yourselves.

You were 25 points off top spot that's not just a bit that's almost 8 victories less in a 38 game season. Even if we lost that last game it would of been 25 points
25 fucking points. 3 top class players may get you some more but untill Roman acceots Terry and Lampard are fucked you will struggle again

 

[Armaan]

Do you think Hazard would choose the best team in the country or the best team in Europe? City at this point have more potential for greatness than Chelsea but maybe Roman will spend on several big names this offseason. Chelsea also have other Belgian players like Lukaku (who is closer to Hazard's age than Kompany anyway). Ironically enough, I thought Hazard would have been turned off from Chelsea after seeing Lukaku's lack of playing time. Also, I thought Di Matteo was going to be given a 1-year trial? Even if he isn't, Chelsea will still get a good enough manager.

I stopped readind after your first line... "BEST TEAM IN EUROPE" hahahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Do you think Hazard would choose the best team in the country or the best team in Europe? City at this point have more potential for greatness than Chelsea but maybe Roman will spend on several big names this offseason. Chelsea also have other Belgian players like Lukaku (who is closer to Hazard's age than Kompany anyway). Ironically enough, I thought Hazard would have been turned off from Chelsea after seeing Lukaku's lack of playing time. Also, I thought Di Matteo was going to be given a 1-year trial? Even if he isn't, Chelsea will still get a good enough manager.

BEST TEAM IN EUROPE? Since when are Barca or Real in for him?

Jog on funny man.

Seems crazy, right? But the player you so badly wanted seems to have made his decision for that reason. And Man City could have easily lost to (10-man) QPR that day. Don't get so full of yourselves.

"Could have" but we didn't... Chelsea "Could have" lost to Bayern but they didn't... Football isn't about what you "could have" done but about what you do do. We deserved to win the title and beat our nearest rivals home and away very connvincingly. Stop talking shite.

 

[supa-dapa-dan]

Do you think Hazard would choose the best team in the country or the best team in Europe? City at this point have more potential for greatness than Chelsea but maybe Roman will spend on several big names this offseason. Chelsea also have other Belgian players like Lukaku (who is closer to Hazard's age than Kompany anyway). Ironically enough, I thought Hazard would have been turned off from Chelsea after seeing Lukaku's lack of playing time. Also, I thought Di Matteo was going to be given a 1-year trial? Even if he isn't, Chelsea will still get a good enough manager.

I stopped readind after your first line... "BEST TEAM IN EUROPE" hahahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Do you think Hazard would choose the best team in the country or the best team in Europe? City at this point have more potential for greatness than Chelsea but maybe Roman will spend on several big names this offseason. Chelsea also have other Belgian players like Lukaku (who is closer to Hazard's age than Kompany anyway). Ironically enough, I thought Hazard would have been turned off from Chelsea after seeing Lukaku's lack of playing time. Also, I thought Di Matteo was going to be given a 1-year trial? Even if he isn't, Chelsea will still get a good enough manager.

BEST TEAM IN EUROPE? Since when are Barca or Real in for him?

Jog on funny man.

Seems crazy, right? But the player you so badly wanted seems to have made his decision for that reason. And Man City could have easily lost to (10-man) QPR that day. Don't get so full of yourselves.

Why are you here?

 

[Andouble]

I feel bad for Kevin de Bruyne now. With Hazard in he would never play, NEVER except if Hazard is injured or anything. They are both the same age and Hazard like Torres are presidential toys so they have to play.

He'll probably go out on loan again. They'll have Marin, Hazard, Mata, Sturridge, and Ramires that can all play in wide positions. Good thing we've got some pacey fullbacks.

 

[Paulmcfc2703]

Chelsea are gonna go on a huge spending spree probably with hazard, modric, hulk and possibly Falcoa how do you know that their not gonna win anything. People this year said that chelsea were old and werent gonna win anything, but hey ho they won the champions league. Cant blame him if he wants to join chelsea

How will they keep all those happy. Bearing in mind Hazard and Torres will have to start.

you could the same about our team how do we keep all of our players happy ?

Dzeko and Mario seem content with the rotation. Hazard has said he wants to play all the games and Torres openly criticized Chelsea after the Champs League win