Eden Hazard

mosssideblue said:
Where has this £150m come from, is it your inflated price you are putting on him to try and strengthen your argument?

Are you also saying that everyone Pep inherited or bought in have not changed their playing style?

Just say you dont rate him/dont like him or whatever, that's fine, but you are throwing out very weak arguments to justify your view imo.
Click to expand...

Mate I think I've made it perfectly clear I neither like him nor rate him, if you think I was trying to hide that you're being daft.

As to the fee, go on then let me know how much you think Chelsea will sell him to us for? Everything so far has said 100 mil +

With regards to changing players, yeah fair enough, Pep has done that, but every play he has changed has been low risk. Signing a player for 100 million + and then changing his game quite a lot is just a huge gamble, too big for me, and as such is not that comparable to getting 6 million pound fabian delph to play as an inverted full back. If anyone can make it work it would be Pep, I just think we would be crazy to take such a risk.
 
Good player but I thought he disappeared in the games against Barcelona this season, with Willian looking a much better player. Just cannot see this happening.
 
Andrew___K said:
I don't think Sane possesses specific vision and skills required to play centrally. And he's still quite inept tactically, thrives in a rigid system where he can pass even without looking, but becomes a headless chicken in a less familiar surroundings (just watch him playing for German NT).

Xavi has mentioned Sane in his interview as an example of a player that can play only 'outside'. Athletic player that can be devastating on the wing, like Ronaldo or Bale, but that's it: “Sané would have a hard time playing inside. Because he does not have the capacity to dribble or to make the turn that creates space. That type of turn is made by Messi, Iniesta, Silva, De Bruyne or Gundogan and if you really push me, Sterling. Not Sané. He needs space.”

That's why I wouldn't put Sane in the same category as Hazard, O.Dembele or Mbappe who have superior vision, sense of surroundings and can play centrally. Different tools for different purposes.
Click to expand...
Yeah I agree, Sane is more like the Gareth Bale starter kit. Pace and Power. With Sane the better dribbler and Bale the better shooter and header of the ball.
 
shak said:
Mate I'm sorry but the whole reason you think Hazard will be great for us is because you think he'll be a completely different player under pep, that pep will change all the shite parts of his game. You don't buy a player because you think you can change him. Maybe if he's a reasonable price but I don't see this club blowing 150 million on a guy who has so many flaws.
Click to expand...
You need to step out of the house and interact with humans a bit more. You obviously don't understand how people work. Hardly seen such rigid ideas about a player, as if everything about him good or bad is set in stone. Incredible stuff.
 
shak said:
Mate I think I've made it perfectly clear I neither like him nor rate him, if you think I was trying to hide that you're being daft.

As to the fee, go on then let me know how much you think Chelsea will sell him to us for? Everything so far has said 100 mil +

With regards to changing players, yeah fair enough, Pep has done that, but every play he has changed has been low risk. Signing a player for 100 million + and then changing his game quite a lot is just a huge gamble, too big for me, and as such is not that comparable to getting 6 million pound fabian delph to play as an inverted full back. If anyone can make it work it would be Pep, I just think we would be crazy to take such a risk.
Click to expand...

Essentially then you have plucked £150m out of the air. I have no idea what we would be willing to pay, but I would be hugely surprised it would be anywhere near that amount.

Are you willing to table what needs to be changed to his game to warrant "quite a lot" and, do you really think our scouts (if indeed we are looking at him), would not know his strengths and weaknesses?

Sterling and Stones were expensive players who Pep has had to mould, so I dont buy your argument of simply saying he's only willing to do this for low rissk

I simply think you are just making stuff up to try and strengthen your argument. Let's see what unravels over these next few weeks, but be under no illusion, Pep and the team will have done full due diligence on Hazard and if we proceed, it will be with eyes wide open.
 
mosssideblue said:
I simply think you are just making stuff up to try and strengthen your argument. Let's see what unravels over these next few weeks, but be under no illusion, Pep and the team will have done full due diligence on Hazard and if we proceed, it will be with eyes wide open.
Click to expand...

That's been obvious since he said Hazard was personally responsible for the past 2 Chelsea collapses. Any evidence of that being true? No, but that doesn't matter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top