Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
I prefer listening to Gary Neville to be honest. Hinchcliffe is dire to listen to and is always quick to criticise. It's painful listening.He's become a bit of a twat where City are concerned. Not sure why though .
I prefer listening to Gary Neville to be honest. Hinchcliffe is dire to listen to and is always quick to criticise. It's painful listening.He's become a bit of a twat where City are concerned. Not sure why though .
Ederson is well on his way to being the best sweeper keeper since Lev Yashin.
I cannot think of a keeper whose distribution was / is better.
I could name plenty that I think were better shot stoppers but Eddie does not get asked to make enough diving saves to make a thorough assessment of him in that department.
What is abundantly clear is he is the best keeper for this City team. A team that I hope will eventually be seen as one of the best in the history of the sport; if that happens, and I am optimistic on that front, Ederson will have been a fundamental component.
To be fair there are some City fans on the match day thread, who offer the same 'look for any negative and focus on that' outlook during every City match. Maybe he is just from that school of thought.I prefer listening to Gary Neville to be honest. Hinchcliffe is dire to listen to and is always quick to criticise. It's painful listening.
It's a pretty dire indictment when City fans would rather listen to Gary Neville!To be fair there are some City fans on the match day thread, who offer the same 'look for any negative and focus on that' outlook during every City match. Maybe he is just from that school of thought.
I still don't like listening to his commentary though.
I mentioned on the match thread yesterday,i think he's just bitter because he missed the boat.He's become a bit of a twat where City are concerned. Not sure why though .