Not sure there was an appropriate punishment because it was in the playoffs.Horrendous decision, in no way is that an appropriate punishment. No way should Boro progress, should be Hull straight through.
Probably because they employed Stevie Wonder to do the spying for them.Funniest thing is that they didn’t win any of the 3 games they’ve admitted spying for.
What and all that profit from the match missed out on, no way they would let that happen.Horrendous decision, in no way is that an appropriate punishment. No way should Boro progress, should be Hull straight through.
So if that happened to us, say the day before a CL final, and we ultimately lost the match because the spy had literally seen and heard everything we were planning to do, you’d be sweet with it?They are though. They’re giving a losing team a second bite of the cherry and thus rewarding them.
“Really can’t see what you don’t get” - it’s called having an opinion different to yours…kind of the point of a forum.
If you think that the punishment is proportionate that’s your opinion. I think it’s ridiculous
Comments like these make me feel all warm and fuzzy inside
View attachment 192547
I wouldnt want a fake title. Would mean nothing to me.So if that happened to us, say the day before a CL final, and we ultimately lost the match because the spy had literally seen and heard everything we were planning to do, you’d be sweet with it?
You wouldn’t expect them to be booted out and the CL given to us?
£200k fineBIt mad really - wasn't expecting that drastic a punishment. I'm not necessarily against it, they need to strongly deter teams from doing it, but I expect it's open to challenge. Didn't Bielsa do something similar a few years back and Leeds weren't docked points from memory?
They added EFL Regulation 127 after that, which has allowed for stricter punishments.BIt mad really - wasn't expecting that drastic a punishment. I'm not necessarily against it, they need to strongly deter teams from doing it, but I expect it's open to challenge. Didn't Bielsa do something similar a few years back and Leeds weren't docked points from memory?
They should have established specific penalty ranges at the time.They added EFL Regulation 127 after that, which has allowed for stricter punishments.
Correct, they were fined, but since then the league introduced the rule, Southampton broke it and club captain Harwood Bellis thought it was funny to wind up Boro players by playing the spy when they scored. Fuck around and find out, good riddance saints.BIt mad really - wasn't expecting that drastic a punishment. I'm not necessarily against it, they need to strongly deter teams from doing it, but I expect it's open to challenge. Didn't Bielsa do something similar a few years back and Leeds weren't docked points from memory?
Horrendous decision, in no way is that an appropriate punishment. No way should Boro progress if they're out, should be Hull straight through.
Disagree.
Southampton clearly gained advantage over tactics and by all accounts this isn't an isolated case.
Reportedly, multiple clubs have since complained about Southampton spying on them and if true, that is as broad daylight cheating as you will get.
I think the reason they have been kicked out was because of multiple claims of spying, not just because one of Southampton's staff was caught with a camera at the Boro training ground.