The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
So, is the standard punishment 4 points off for next season because, true to football authorities, they’ve royally bolloxed this up?
No longer works bud i got caught shoplifting last night and when i asked the copper what about Man City he still banged up ffsSouthampton just released a new statment there's a lot to take in but it says
WHAT ABOUT MANCHESTER CITY
30 years in my case! I'm in the same boat and will go and give them a watch for shits and giggles occasionally, but I agree that their fans can be a bit more feral than you'd expect. They'd worked themselves up into a froth over the semi so getting beat seemed to really trigger them.Being based down south for the last 10+ years I have always had a bit of a soft spot for saints. Have been to a few games, all my friends and work colleagues here support them.
That said the last two City Saints games I’ve been given absolute vile abuse by their fans and I know this maybe isnt a fair reflection of them as a fan base because this happens at football all the time.
But Wembley recently was a joke, the amount of fans that squared up to me all whilst I was stood next to the police as I was waiting for friends at a nearby car park.
Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch.
Logistically impossible, you're right. But morally, why should Boro step straight into the final when other teams have been equally affected?Before Saturday?
I have been to a few training grounds and most of them have tall hedges or fences to make it virtually impossible to “spy”. It should be down to a club to not give the opportunity to have unwanted observers.
That's the same logic that weirdos use when they blame women in short skirts when they get assaulted.
What he did is against the rules and he was stood on private land. It doesn't matter if there was no hedge, he was breaking EFL rules and also stood on private land. Every aspect of it was against the rules.
Hilarious that you bring up such a heinous comment to attempt to make a point that has nothing to do with the conversation.
Saying things like “you’re still missing the point” don’t further your argument.
You are seemingly incapable of understanding the concept of proportionality. And seemingly also struggling with reading comprehension because you seem to think I am saying Southampton didn’t do anything wrong.
Southampton cheated, yes. They should be punished, yes. The punishment given is totally disproportionate. That’s what I am saying.
I won’t bother breaking it down more granularly than that for you.
Sounds like "2 men enter,1 man leaves".Only way to decide this is for a Boro vs Soton Hell in a Cell rematch on neutral ground.
Cell round the pitch
Ball can’t go out of play
No fouls outside the penalty areas
No stoppages for injuries
Winner faces Hull.
The real question is, what punishment would they have got, if they’d finished 7th?FFS.
I know that’s what you’re saying. Saying it 13 times doesn’t support further your position.
What punishment would you have given them?
There’s no real punishment in this situation that doesn’t feel overly lenient or overly harsh.I do feel sorry for how heavy handed they've been treated regarding the punishment. (Cheating is cheating i know). It feels like anger towards other cheating clubs has resulted in the weight of expectation of a heavy punishment. And I do think the tribunal they have will find that too. I don't think they will be reinstated in the play offs though.
But wtf Chelsea got away with compared to this. Amazing really.