Elon Musk

That won’t work.
The paedo charge failed because the English guy sued Musk in the US where the libel law required him to prove he wasn’t a paedophile.
In the U.K. it is the other way around, so the libel law here would require you to prove he was a nonce.

I did know this.

1. Nonce doesn't mean paedophile, it could be another kind of sex offender or sexual deviant.

I would enter into evidence.

Facemash.

In a blog entry, Zuckerberg noted, "The Kirkland Facebook (referring to the Kirkland House intranet) is open on my computer desktop, and some of these people have pretty horrendous Facebook pictures. I almost want to put some of these faces next to pictures of farm animals and have people vote on which is more attractive."

Does Zuckerberg find farmyard animals attractive?

Also I called him a necrophile. If he wants to sue a random man on the Internet for suggesting he has an interest in dead bodies then he's welcome to.
 
I did know this.

1. Nonce doesn't mean paedophile, it could be another kind of sex offender or sexual deviant.

I would enter into evidence.

Facemash.

In a blog entry, Zuckerberg noted, "The Kirkland Facebook (referring to the Kirkland House intranet) is open on my computer desktop, and some of these people have pretty horrendous Facebook pictures. I almost want to put some of these faces next to pictures of farm animals and have people vote on which is more attractive."

Does Zuckerberg find farmyard animals attractive?

Also I called him a necrophile. If he wants to sue a random man on the Internet for suggesting he has an interest in dead bodies then he's welcome to.
I’m not sure ‘nonce’ has any particularly legally enforceable definition. It’s what makes it such an effective word.
 
Doesn't nonce stem from "not on normal courtyard exercise" for the cunts that had to be 'protected' for being wrong ones, to say the least, or is that just a Chinese whisper over the years?
 
Doesn't nonce stem from "not on normal courtyard exercise" for the cunts that had to be 'protected' for being wrong ones, to say the least, or is that just a Chinese whisper over the years?

It's most likely a backronym. Seems unlikely for prison slang to develop an acronym from a formal sounding neutral euphemism. Prisoners aren't exactly people who choose their words in such a manor.

 
Doesn't nonce stem from "not on normal courtyard exercise" for the cunts that had to be 'protected' for being wrong ones, to say the least, or is that just a Chinese whisper over the years?
That’s what you call a folk-etymology. i.e. something plausible-sounding, but made up. IIRC the original prison slang-term was used for a ‘grass’ or someone worthless - you watch some 70/ 80s tv shows set in prisons and criminal settings (e.g. Porridge, Sweeney, Only Fools and Horses) and I think that’s how it was used. It’s only fairly recently it’s come to mean a paedophile.
 
Last edited:
That’s what you call a folk-etymology. i.e. something plausible-sounding, but made up. IIRC the original prison slang-term was used for a ‘grass’ or someone worthless - you watch some 70/ 80s tv shows set in prisons and criminal settings (e.g. Porridge, Sweeney, Only Fools and Horses) and I think that’s how it was used. It’s only fairly recently it’s come to mean a paedophile.

Yep, it likely came from this. A time when grasses and gay men had the same social standing.

"and is likely a toned-down usage of the same insult), or Nance, nance (“effeminate man, homosexual”), from nancy or nancyboy."
 
I did know this.

1. Nonce doesn't mean paedophile, it could be another kind of sex offender or sexual deviant.

I would enter into evidence.

Facemash.

In a blog entry, Zuckerberg noted, "The Kirkland Facebook (referring to the Kirkland House intranet) is open on my computer desktop, and some of these people have pretty horrendous Facebook pictures. I almost want to put some of these faces next to pictures of farm animals and have people vote on which is more attractive."

Does Zuckerberg find farmyard animals attractive?

Also I called him a necrophile. If he wants to sue a random man on the Internet for suggesting he has an interest in dead bodies then he's welcome to.
If that's right about the burden of proof in US libel, how would he prove he's not a necrophile?
 
Here's the two options:

1. A visibly excited and socially awkward man who was dancing around shouting and wildly gesticulating on stage, does a gesture where he touches his heart and points at the audience was talking about how his "heart goes out to you", and the connotations to Nazis was a mere coincidence, after which he started talking about the need to hope for the future and space exploration while still wildly gesticulating.

2. A visibly excited and socially awkward man who was dancing around shouting and wildly gesticulating on stage, decided in front of global cameras and every journalist on the planet watching that now would be the best time to reveal he's a hidden Nazi and do a Nazi salute to the audience, and the heart thing was a mere coincidence, after which he started talking about the need to hope for the future and space exploration while still wildly gesticulating.

Some people think two is the more likely option. And I have lots of questions there.

Oh I guess the third option is that he accidentally did a Nazi salute because he was wildly gesticulating and its a salute he often does in other venues away from cameras and his muscle memory kicked in. But again, I have questions.

Even the ADL gave him the benefit of the doubt after seeing the video in context and they hate the guys guts and have accused him or Nazi-adjacency in the past.
I vote #2.
You can smell the Nazi on that one. I mean he changed Twitter to X. If you bend the X slightly you get the Nazi Swastika.


He os a Nazi
 
Option 3 (and the most likely in my opinion). Someone working in the background, pulling trump’s strings (likely someone like Steven Miller, who has a track record of sneaking ‘accidental/ coincidental’ nazi shit into things) told him exactly what to do and how to make it half look like he didn’t mean it.
So your opinion is a conspiracy theory. Well that's not one I can get behind.
 
I like to think a right wing (extreme right wing) government globally is beneficial for him financially and deregulation wise for his own empire - rather than he just wants WW3 and full nazism.
Or — he’s attempting to trigger those who already don’t care for him as a matter of “revenge” because he’s so thin-skinned about criticism. Just like some other fellow we’ve all heard of. And a goodly number of his followers.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top