gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I think like most of us when we have a good run, we think we’re fucking infallible - and we’re not.Do you think he did it on purpose? Just to show how rich and powerful he is?
I think like most of us when we have a good run, we think we’re fucking infallible - and we’re not.Do you think he did it on purpose? Just to show how rich and powerful he is?
Do you think he did it on purpose? Just to show how rich and powerful he is?
Same.Thanks guys. So he didn’t want to protect free speech after all?!
I’ve deleted Twitter. Cold turkey. It was very addictive and I largely feel better for it.
The funny thing is we knew this 6 months ago, but he came out and lied saying they'd all returned to the platform and things were going great to satiate his fanboys.
Ad revenue was about $4.5Bn before the takeover.
So when he says it's down by half, he means there's a $2,250,000,000 hole in the accounts.
That cannot be correct, legally speaking, assuming it was just the price that was offered. The doctrine of offer and acceptance on a transaction of that magnitude cannot apply to a simple coming to terms on the price. The offer is inchoate.It’s public domain that he made the offer as a joke, never expecting Twitter to accept and was then forced to complete the purchase.
I’ve no desire to try and think like an egotistical tyrant but perhaps he went through with the purchase to save face?
He’s been far too hands on rather than appointing good management and allowing them to do their job.
Thanks guys. So he didn’t want to protect free speech after all?!
I’ve deleted Twitter. Cold turkey. It was very addictive and I largely feel better for it.
But everyone who is anyone is (was) on Twitter from pop stars to politicians.Twitter is a turd that needs flushing, if he kills it he will be doing the world a favour.
Meanwhile droves of upset people have joined threads and given a human calculator all of their details for the privilege.
And that's where he's fucked up, seemingly not realising that that's where the value is, not in the platform itself. Sure, the platform has got to work reliably and be able to deal with the demand, but the real value of Twitter was that you could connect with high profile people and be fairly sure it was them posting. Musk fucking this up would be like LinkedIn pissing off all the recruiters and thinking they still had a valuable platform.But everyone who is anyone is (was) on Twitter from pop stars to politicians.
Musks term as ceo of Twitter will go down as possibly the worst bit of strategic leadership of all time. He took what Twitter had as a usp, and killed it off (allowing anyone a blue tick and any username killed of the draw of the big verified celebs, journalists and institutions). He also made the major problem, bots and spam, 10x worse.And that's where he's fucked up, seemingly not realising that that's where the value is, not in the platform itself. Sure, the platform has got to work reliably and be able to deal with the demand, but the real value of Twitter was that you could connect with high profile people and be fairly sure it was them posting. Musk fucking this up would be like LinkedIn pissing off all the recruiters and thinking they still had a valuable platform.
Now you could shift the focus and potentially get a more valuable user base. Instagram has basically spent the past 5 years pissing off all of the photographers that were the early lifeblood of the app but they're probably getting higher engagement and more revenue as a result. Twitter, on the other hand, has tanked.
And that's where he's fucked up, seemingly not realising that that's where the value is, not in the platform itself. Sure, the platform has got to work reliably and be able to deal with the demand, but the real value of Twitter was that you could connect with high profile people and be fairly sure it was them posting. Musk fucking this up would be like LinkedIn pissing off all the recruiters and thinking they still had a valuable platform.
Now you could shift the focus and potentially get a more valuable user base. Instagram has basically spent the past 5 years pissing off all of the photographers that were the early lifeblood of the app but they're probably getting higher engagement and more revenue as a result. Twitter, on the other hand, has tanked.
Really? They could have fooled me. When you look at suggested content, it is almost exclusively video-based. Often reposted content from TikTok. Instagram is where you go to find what was trending on TikTok a week ago, and Facebook is where you go to find what was trending on Instagram a month ago.Instagram have actually acknowledged that deranking photography and trying to copy TikTok was a mistake. They’re rolling back on it to an extent.
Really? They could have fooled me. When you look at suggested content, it is almost exclusively video-based. Often reposted content from TikTok. Instagram is where you go to find what was trending on TikTok a week ago, and Facebook is where you go to find what was trending on Instagram a month ago.