Elon Musk

I think you’ll find he isn’t here to have a real discussion, he just wants to post ignorant takes that are veiled defences of horrible people.
Tbh I thought twitter users were mostly cunts before musk, and are mostly cunts now. It's always been a cess pit where people create their own echo chambers or deliberately seek to cause or feign offence and outrage. The only positive purpose it seems to have is to act as a sort of sump for online idiots. Maybe in the very early days it was less toxic.
 
I will reiterate how I have made Twitter work for me:

1) After a lot of hard work and time blocking hundreds of users, my feed has been whittled down generally to the things I care about.
2) I almost never read the comments by others (similar to how I read newspaper articles), just the main post written by authors whose content I know and trust.
3) I almost never post (nor do I argue, with the lone exception of making fun of the very occasional Utd fan). I might comment twice a year and haven't written an actual tweet in maybe two years.
4) There are still a lot of ads, most of them totally irrelevant, so once I see one more than 3 times or so I block the entity sending it. I assume this narrows down my dislikes for the algorithm so that eventually the ads will be more targeted to me, but given the poor financial performance of the platform, my guess is that advertisers tend to be lousy companies or very, very broad platform users (like McDonalds, e.g.)

As such Twitter is still a useable and useful platform for me, though I dislike knowing my eyeballs help Musk (who, by the way, I have blocked).
 
Tbh I thought twitter users were mostly cunts before musk, and are mostly cunts now. It's always been a cess pit where people create their own echo chambers or deliberately seek to cause or feign offence and outrage. The only positive purpose it seems to have is to act as a sort of sump for online idiots. Maybe in the very early days it was less toxic.
I've always thought the echo chamber issue was a strange way to look at things. If you've read someone wax poetic on a topic 18 different times, or seen someone wax poetic once each on 18 different topics, and either disagreed or learned nothing interesting/new every time, why would you listen to that person any more? They're a distraction or a waste of time. But let's say you do stick with them . . . then instance 19 better be so profound it makes up for the other 18 times they were useless.
 
Last edited:
I've always thought the echo chamber issue was a strange way to look at things. If you've read someone wax poetic on a topic 18 different times, or seen someone wax poetic wax once each on 18 different topics, and either disagreed or learned nothing interesting/new every time, why would you listen to that person any more? They're a distraction or a waste of time. But let's say you do stick with them . . . then instance 19 better be so profound it makes up for the other 18 times they were useless.

The echo chambers form in the “for you” section, you can see it happen. Look at a subject in a tweet and get more of the same subject, look at those and again more of the same subjects.

I’ve manipulated it quite a few times to test it out. Click a subject you’re not overly interested in and watch the wave of the same subject matter.

I am clearly in an anti Trump bubble tho when I go in that section.
 

SEC plans to seek sanctions against Musk for skipping testimony

It was the second time the billionaire tech mogul skipped out on testifying for the probe of the acquisition of the social media site now known as X.

“The Court must make clear that Musk’s gamesmanship and delay tactics must cease,” SEC attorneys wrote in the filing.

Musk was slated to testify on the morning of Sept. 10 at the SEC’s Los Angeles office, the agency wrote in the filing, adding that three of its own attorneys had flown in the day before. However, just hours before the testimony’s scheduled start, one of Musk’s attorneys notified the SEC that he would not be able to attend because he had to “urgently travel” to Cape Canaveral, Florida, the day before for SpaceX’s latest launch, Polaris Dawn, according to the filing.

The SEC wants Musk to be held in contempt for waiting so long to alert the agency that he would not be in attendance for the testimony. It’s also seeking to recover its travel costs and for other relief deemed appropriate by the court.


 

SEC plans to seek sanctions against Musk for skipping testimony

It was the second time the billionaire tech mogul skipped out on testifying for the probe of the acquisition of the social media site now known as X.

“The Court must make clear that Musk’s gamesmanship and delay tactics must cease,” SEC attorneys wrote in the filing.

Musk was slated to testify on the morning of Sept. 10 at the SEC’s Los Angeles office, the agency wrote in the filing, adding that three of its own attorneys had flown in the day before. However, just hours before the testimony’s scheduled start, one of Musk’s attorneys notified the SEC that he would not be able to attend because he had to “urgently travel” to Cape Canaveral, Florida, the day before for SpaceX’s latest launch, Polaris Dawn, according to the filing.

The SEC wants Musk to be held in contempt for waiting so long to alert the agency that he would not be in attendance for the testimony. It’s also seeking to recover its travel costs and for other relief deemed appropriate by the court.


So, basically a massive pissing contest. Musk is absolutely showing contempt. If he truly wants to do humanity a favour he should pull the plug on x/twitter and write it off as a tax loss. If we all woke up tomorrow and found twitter had vanished, would the world be in any way worse?
 
So, basically a massive pissing contest. Musk is absolutely showing contempt. If he truly wants to do humanity a favour he should pull the plug on x/twitter and write it off as a tax loss. If we all woke up tomorrow and found twitter had vanished, would the world be in any way worse?
Your mistake is thinking Musk has ever actually done anything with the goal of helping humanity.
 
Your mistake is thinking Musk has ever actually done anything with the goal of helping humanity.
I honestly can't work him out. Genius on some sort of spectrum most likely. I don't think he's a saint or evil incarnate either though. I'm not sure even he knows what he wants to achieve with twitter
 
I honestly can't work him out. Genius on some sort of spectrum most likely. I don't think he's a saint or evil incarnate either though. I'm not sure even he knows what he wants to achieve with twitter

Your mistake is assuming he's a genius. That's part of his mystique.

He's just an old fashioned industrialist who realised exaggerating this myth was good for his brand.

A weird creepy bloke who has accumulated too much money and wealth and lost a sense of perspective, he probably never held.
 
I honestly can't work him out. Genius on some sort of spectrum most likely. I don't think he's a saint or evil incarnate either though. I'm not sure even he knows what he wants to achieve with twitter
Not a genius, just someone given extreme privilege (and allowed to commit fraud at a frequency and level that would have had you and me in prison long ago).

And I think very, very few people that have ever lived have been evil incarnate. Nearly everyone was “good” to some other person or group of people at some point. Even the likes of Hitler and Stalin were “good” to people at times, even as adults. Even up until their death.

What is true of those people we generally hold up as examples of “evil humans”, though, is the width and depth of the harm they caused to most people, and often their “reasoning” for doing so.

Whilst Musk is obviously not in the same tier as Hilter and Stalin in collective harm (yet, anyway), he has always been in a similar psychological profile. And he has fairly recently begun to enter a realm of influence and means to potentially allow him to cause widespread harm (Twitter is only a small facet of that). In some ways, he may actually have a greater ability to cause harm to more people because of how the world has changed since the mid-20th century and how he has chosen to exploit that change.

The reason I constantly speak out against him (and Trump)—and highlight his malfeasance and the danger he poses to people everywhere—is that I never want to see him join the echelon of Hitler, Stalin, and others.
 
Very simply, he bought the platform to influence people and you can’t do that, as it has a ‘Block’ feature, then you change it.

Looks like Musk is all about chaos and disorder, but why?

What's chaotic and disorderly about allowing him to control the things twitter users see at the top of their list?!

I mean, it's not like he's been announced as a putative head of some mad government commission, is it?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top