Enzo Fernandez

Your administrator can send him my address.But tell him from now on we only sell 75%
 
Looks like your neighbours dont find it too unrealistic. I told you about Julian and told you about Enzo making the Mundial.I am now giving you another bit of news the next great River gem Axel Encinas
Never gonna happen.

I will apologize to you if it does, but common sense dictates no way will it happen.

You overrate what clubs will spend.
 
How can they reject an offer higher than the clause? Surely if the clause is payed it's out of the clubs hands?
Player would get more wages. Whether he gets more shot at Trophies is different story. Chelsea despite mammoth spending don't look like mounting a title challenge for some reason, I can be wrong here but this is what I feel. Potter has history of going on winless streak unlike City Or Pool who can ho in winning streaks especially City. 38 match sustained title challenge os different story
 
How can they reject an offer higher than the clause? Surely if the clause is payed it's out of the clubs hands?
It'll be a kicker to the club to accept terms of payment, hes an extra XX and we'll pay this over X windows instead of upfront. Im assuming.
 
Chelsea turning into psg? how can they comply with ffp after spending blindly?
The new owner rule, meaning they can have a three year period of accelerated squad investment, as long as the owner can prove they've personally got the money to spend & it's not a loan leveraged against the club.

It's the same new owner consideration we asked for 12 years ago & were told to fuck off. )(
 
The new owner rule, meaning they can have a three year period of accelerated squad investment, as long as the owner can prove they've personally got the money to spend & it's not a loan leveraged against the club.

It's the same new owner consideration we asked for 12 years ago & were told to fuck off. )(


They will 100% scale it back but they did say coming in they wanted to spend a lot to revamp the entire squad. Some of the signings look like bad investments already but they’re just doing what they said they’d do. Eventually the drought will come, the spending will slow down/stop and Chelsea will have to make it work with the squad that’s been built.
 
How can they reject an offer higher than the clause? Surely if the clause is payed it's out of the clubs hands?

Maybe the offer is higher than the clause so the buying team can structure payment terms in their favour. The clause may be for a full payment.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top