Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
BedsBlue68 said:
Fact or consipracy theory?
Click to expand...
Make of it whatever you like.
If you think that Assange’s revelations about the heinous crimes committed by the British establishment were fairy stories and truly think that they wouldn’t murder people to protect the perverts within their ranks then I suppose you should file it under conspiracy - along with the dead weapons inspector et al.
 
OccupiedPalestineBlues said:
Make of it whatever you like.
If you think that Assange’s revelations about the heinous crimes committed by the British establishment were fairy stories and truly think that they wouldn’t murder people to protect the perverts within their ranks then I suppose you should file it under conspiracy - along with the dead weapons inspector et al.
Click to expand...
Don’t forget Jack the Ripper.
 
mancity2012_eamo said:
Don’t forget Jack the Ripper.
Click to expand...
Nice link up.
I like sharp thinkers and I’d probably enjoy a natter with you over a pint fella.
However, I don’t have any opinion on who J the R May or may not have been and I’m not so sure that it matters that much at this distance.
And they pale into insignificance when compared with the crimes of state.
 
OccupiedPalestineBlues said:
Make of it whatever you like.
If you think that Assange’s revelations about the heinous crimes committed by the British establishment were fairy stories and truly think that they wouldn’t murder people to protect the perverts within their ranks then I suppose you should file it under conspiracy - along with the dead weapons inspector et al.
Click to expand...
Did i say that the British Establishment haven't done things like all similar organisations around the world, they very likely have.

You presented your post as fact, when in reality it is conspiracy theory in the absence of any evidence. What it is is a load of theories and most likely unrelated things linked together to match in a convincing way to match an agenda or theory someone wanted to put forward (bringing Assange into the discussion for example as support to a adds to it).

Same as most conspiracy theories tbh, some will be true most will be flights of fancy. Neither you or i know which is which and probably never will. As you say make of it as you like. You clearly have a beef with "the man" so you will be more inclined to believe them. Personally prefer to make my mind up based on evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top