Centurions
Well-Known Member
That's one word for him.For a Royalist I’m surprised you got William’s number wrong.
He’ll be William V, if he chooses to be William.
However given the rest of your fawning claptrap I presume you are a WUM.
That's one word for him.For a Royalist I’m surprised you got William’s number wrong.
He’ll be William V, if he chooses to be William.
However given the rest of your fawning claptrap I presume you are a WUM.
Well I disagreed with it. The new side entrance was wonderful and not ‘on the face’. They finished up with a boring neo classical nonsense whicn is not what architecture about. BUT BUT BUT while we may honestly disagree you suggested I made it up. Abysmal that you have not addressed that. Intellectually dishonest.I agreed with his take on that as I hope would anyone who's had the misfortune to see what the new barbarians did to the Louvre. Identifying gullible consumption of internet sewage is the opposite of MAGA btw, much of it emanates from them anyway.
I can attest to William being a decent fellow.Honestly the ordure posters smear folk with from the internet! Utter rubbish from the IRA about Mountabatten and similar foul false innuendo about planning objections and the NHS. Totally made up evil propaganda.
God Save Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III and King William VI when his time comes. Three of the finest humans you are ever likely to encounter in a world which is rapidly going down the plughole.
I didn't suggest you made it up, just for the record. You obviously enjoy insulting folk so don't let that detail stand in your way though.Well I disagreed with it. The new side entrance was wonderful and not ‘on the face’. They finished up with a boring neo classical nonsense whicn is not what architecture about. BUT BUT BUT while we may honestly disagree you suggested I made it up. Abysmal that you have not addressed that. Intellectually dishonest.
I'm sure there's a word for you pair as well. Here's an interesting piece on Prince Andrew'That's one word for him.For a Royalist I’m surprised you got William’s number wrong.He’ll be William V, if he chooses to be William.
However given the rest of your fawning claptrap I presume you are a WUM.
You'll upset the forelock tuggers with that post.Some journalist wrote Andrew's major fault was that he was unable 'to read a room'. I would suggest that his entitlement , frequently displayed, meant he didn't give a proverbial about the room or anybody in it. All the royals are the same. They expected to be treated with deference wherever they go yet have done nothing to deserve it.
I always suggest people that they read Rebel Prince by Tom Bower to get a true insight into the King's character.
As for his mother she also showed her true character in that she bailed out her son to ensure that 'the firm' was protected rather than let him face the consequences of his excessive behaviour. In the real world it might be called aiding and abetting
A N Wilson!I didn't suggest you made it up, just for the record. You obviously enjoy insulting folk so don't let that detail stand in your way though.
I'm sure there's a word for you pair as well. Here's an interesting piece on Prince Andrew'
![]()
We seem to agree about him anyway.A N Wilson!
Oh do fuck off.
He’d be living in His Majesty’s Prison rather than His Majesty’s CastleHe should be in jail mate.
You said it was propaganda i.e. made up, so stop obfuscating.I didn't suggest you made it up, just for the record. You obviously enjoy insulting folk so don't let that detail stand in your way though.
I'm sure there's a word for you pair as well. Here's an interesting piece on Prince Andrew'
![]()
Disgraceful. And yet they forced Harry, Meghan and their young child out of frogmore and forced them to pay for a home they barely lived in.
You seem to have a novel understanding of propaganda and indeed what constitutes insulting behaviour. Each to his own though.You said it was propaganda i.e. made up, so stop obfuscating. PS When did I insult anybody?
Ah ha, rumbled. You need to learn not to make unevidenced statements and demand acceptance of them. You’ve done it again here: I asked you for evidence and your answer is effectively “I haven’t got any”.You seem to have a novel understanding of propaganda and indeed what constitutes insulting behaviour. Each to his own though.
None of them pay rent. We pay it for them.
Looks to me like the above constitutes further irrefutable proof of your epistemological difficulties I'm afraid but do feel free to provide an example of what you allege are my 'unevidenced' propositions.Ah ha, rumbled. You need to learn not to make unevidenced statements and demand acceptance of them. You’ve done it again here: I asked you for evidence and your answer is effectively “I haven’t got any”.
It won't be Philip or Louis. Not a chance. There will never be a King Arthur. George might be a go-er. William is too orange.Sorry, one less - I read he also has the option of choosing a new regnal name - perhaps one of his middle names - Arthur, Philip, or Louis, or George, like his great-grandfather.
Who’s William VI?
William VI it was really nothingWilliam VI - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org