Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
I agreed with his take on that as I hope would anyone who's had the misfortune to see what the new barbarians did to the Louvre. Identifying gullible consumption of internet sewage is the opposite of MAGA btw, much of it emanates from them anyway.
Well I disagreed with it. The new side entrance was wonderful and not ‘on the face’. They finished up with a boring neo classical nonsense whicn is not what architecture about. BUT BUT BUT while we may honestly disagree you suggested I made it up. Abysmal that you have not addressed that. Intellectually dishonest.
 
Honestly the ordure posters smear folk with from the internet! Utter rubbish from the IRA about Mountabatten and similar foul false innuendo about planning objections and the NHS. Totally made up evil propaganda.
God Save Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III and King William VI when his time comes. Three of the finest humans you are ever likely to encounter in a world which is rapidly going down the plughole.
I can attest to William being a decent fellow.
 
Well I disagreed with it. The new side entrance was wonderful and not ‘on the face’. They finished up with a boring neo classical nonsense whicn is not what architecture about. BUT BUT BUT while we may honestly disagree you suggested I made it up. Abysmal that you have not addressed that. Intellectually dishonest.
I didn't suggest you made it up, just for the record. You obviously enjoy insulting folk so don't let that detail stand in your way though.

For a Royalist I’m surprised you got William’s number wrong.He’ll be William V, if he chooses to be William.
However given the rest of your fawning claptrap I presume you are a WUM.
That's one word for him.
I'm sure there's a word for you pair as well. Here's an interesting piece on Prince Andrew'

 
Last edited:
Some journalist wrote Andrew's major fault was that he was unable 'to read a room'. I would suggest that his entitlement , frequently displayed, meant he didn't give a proverbial about the room or anybody in it. All the royals are the same. They expected to be treated with deference wherever they go yet have done nothing to deserve it.
I always suggest people that they read Rebel Prince by Tom Bower to get a true insight into the King's character.
As for his mother she also showed her true character in that she bailed out her son to ensure that 'the firm' was protected rather than let him face the consequences of his excessive behaviour. In the real world it might be called aiding and abetting
You'll upset the forelock tuggers with that post.
 
I didn't suggest you made it up, just for the record. You obviously enjoy insulting folk so don't let that detail stand in your way though.


I'm sure there's a word for you pair as well. Here's an interesting piece on Prince Andrew'

A N Wilson!
Oh do fuck off.
 
I didn't suggest you made it up, just for the record. You obviously enjoy insulting folk so don't let that detail stand in your way though.


I'm sure there's a word for you pair as well. Here's an interesting piece on Prince Andrew'

You said it was propaganda i.e. made up, so stop obfuscating.
PS When did I insult anybody?
 
You seem to have a novel understanding of propaganda and indeed what constitutes insulting behaviour. Each to his own though.
Ah ha, rumbled. You need to learn not to make unevidenced statements and demand acceptance of them. You’ve done it again here: I asked you for evidence and your answer is effectively “I haven’t got any”.
 
Ah ha, rumbled. You need to learn not to make unevidenced statements and demand acceptance of them. You’ve done it again here: I asked you for evidence and your answer is effectively “I haven’t got any”.
Looks to me like the above constitutes further irrefutable proof of your epistemological difficulties I'm afraid but do feel free to provide an example of what you allege are my 'unevidenced' propositions.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top