Quite right too.US judge has ruled his US attorneys can be served and satisfy US law requirements.
You mean like Liverpool giving City £1m because their employees did not hack City's data base?Nothing shouts innocent as much as “I’ve already paid her off” does it?
Nothing shouts innocent as much as “I’ve already paid her off” does it?
Have you considered the possibility that they can find no credible evidence and that Guiffre's case is full of discrepancies?Well there’s a shock! Who’d have thought the Met wouldn’t be taking this any further?
Convicted in the high court of the tabloids and social media, such is the world we now live in. In another 50 years our courts will probably be on-line and run along the lines of the voice or strictly as we as a society become increasingly more stupid.Have you considered the possibility that they can find no credible evidence and that Guiffre's case is full of discrepancies?
More damming from Andy's point of view is that the Bluemoon Crown Court has found him guilty on all counts.Convicted in the high court of the tabloids and social media, such is the world we now live in. In another 50 years our courts will probably be on-line and run along the lines of the voice or strictly as we as a society become increasingly more stupid.
You sure it wasn't the Merseyside Police investigating it?Well there’s a shock! Who’d have thought the Met wouldn’t be taking this any further?
Way to go victim blaming , it has already been established she was trafficked and abused by epistein has it not ?The Met have dropped their investigation into Giuffre's allegations. Andrew is probably a dodgy **** but she is a serial liar too in my view.
Have you considered that she may have 'suddenly' become a little cloudy in her recollection of events, and the CPS have advised the Met accordingly that they would not have enough to proceed with a prosecution?Have you considered the possibility that they can find no credible evidence and that Guiffre's case is full of discrepancies?
Guilty in the court of public opinion, I tend to leave legal expertise to those who have actually studied it.
I've done a fair bit of background reading on Epstein's antics, and I've also watched the 'Filthy Rich' documentary (Netflix). I've come to the conclusion that anyone who ever visited Epstein's island as a guest and didn't have some concerns as to where all the young, pretty girls were coming from is either complicit in what was going on or INCREDIBLY stupid.Guilty in the court of public opinion, I tend to leave legal expertise to those who have actually studied it.
Don't know if he's guilty or not but anybody who has seen how he's acted since the accusations were made will probably be leaning towards him being a bit of a wrong'un.
Hes hardly come across as a trustworthy defendant has he?
But, whilst the circumstantial evidence is pretty damning I doubt it's enough to convict.
I'll stick to my opinion I've held about him for years - he's a bit of a wet blanket who would likely be unemployed and bothering people in wetherspoons on a daily basis if he wasn't born into that weird cult.
Andy?More damming from Andy's point of view is that the Bluemoon Crown Court has found him guilty on all counts.