Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
MillionMilesAway said:
It's not news that Charles was overheard saying he couldn't bear him about 15-20 years ago.

In this case, it's a partial quote of a greater whole. Witchell was pretty clear that Andrew is still out in the cold and he can't see how he comes back in, but for the rest of the family having the matter done is important.

I don't see how that statement is a problem, as it's not as though the Royal Family have forgiven Andrew. It's possible to be relieved and angry still.
Click to expand...
I await any rehabilitation of royal duties, and whether he gets dressed up as Colonel-in-Chief of the Epstein Dragoons and Maxwell Light Horse.
 
Giuffre gets further millions to add to the millions she has already received without the ball ache of having to answer some potentially very damaging questions about both her credibility and actions when ‘working’ for Epstein. Why wouldn’t she settle?
 
carlosthejackal said:
He’s a nonce , very good friends with two convicted sex offenders , his mum and family are still actually talking to him , people still bow and scrape to this lot , no wonder the country is fucked .
Click to expand...
You think a mother should cut off her son for shagging a seventeen year old?

I don’t think I know a single mother who would do that.
 
blueinsa said:
If she really wanted the justice she told the world she wanted, she would have had her day in court, seen him found guilty and not settled for a pay out.

Unfortunately it’s seemingly always about the money these highly publicised cases involving the famous and celebrity.
Click to expand...
Alternatively; Royal nonce uses wealth and power to evade a private prosecution after lying through his teeth for years.
 
stonerblue said:
Alternatively; Royal nonce uses wealth and power to evade a private prosecution after lying through his teeth for years.
Click to expand...

Takes two to agree a deal though mate.

She should have made him testify as far as I am concerned and her demands for justice now seem a tad hollow as it seems she thinks justice is having money in the bank and not a sexual deviant prosecuted.
 
mosssideblue said:
I only suggested that because on TV this morning, they said at the time, she was underage.
Click to expand...
i think you’ve entirely missed the point of my post. Just because she was underage in NY Sate, doesn’t make him a paedophile.

The age of consent in Nigeria is 11. Does that mean a man having sex with an 11 year old in Nigeria isn’t a paedophile?
 
Don't know what angers me most about this case, the fact that he did it ( and i think most blokes would have done the same if someone threw a willing 17 year old at them) or the fact that he tried to use his high ranking position to worm out of it.
 
blueinsa said:
Takes two to agree a deal though mate.

She should have made him testify as far as I am concerned and her demands for justice now seem a tad hollow as it seems she thinks justice is having money in the bank and not a sexual deviant prosecuted.
Click to expand...
Isn’t the money going to a charity?
 
blueinsa said:
Takes two to agree a deal though mate.

She should have made him testify as far as I am concerned and her demands for justice now seem a tad hollow as it seems she thinks justice is having money in the bank and not a sexual deviant prosecuted.
Click to expand...
It was a civil case. Money in the bank is literally the justice she'd have received had the jury found in her favour.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top