Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Prestwich_Blue said:
You only have a problem with one sort of racist though. That's got a lot to do with religion.
Click to expand...
I have a problem with racists who kill children, or who celebrate it.
That is not an issue of faith.
So, as I condemn the actions of the Israeli state and its overwhelming use of force to subjugate the people of Gaza, I condemn the extremism that leads to Palestinian terrorists taking hostages and killing innocent people from Israel.
Once religion is taken from the equation, and I am an atheist, you are left with the barbarism - and it is sickening. It also happens to be overwhelmingly directed towards Palestine from Israel, and the scale of destruction and land seizure clearly demonstrate that. That it is celebrated by some fans from Maccabi led me to my earlier post.
As regards the depravity written of in Guiffre's book, which is really what is pertinent to this thread, I care not who the perpetrator is, and I long for Trump to be outed as well as any other alleged abuser of trafficked minors. If that is the former Israeli PM, fine, if it is Bill Gates, fine, Musk...I couldn't give a toss as long as they face justice.
 
Last edited:
Prestwich_Blue said:
I'm sure there's many other people who have something to hide but let's pick on the Israeli Jew. So fucking transparent.
Click to expand...

I think the extent to which your premise is true depends on who else is in the same boat as Barak but is being treated differently from him? My limited understanding is that Barak's name has come up now because the posthumous memoir refers to an ex-prime minster and this seems to triangulate with some civil proceedings she previously took out in relation to Barak which he has strenuously denied ? So the question to me is are there other people named or inferred in the book in a similar way, who are not having the spotlight turned on them? If so you may have a point. However I've not followed the publication of the memoir closely enough to know whether that is the case or not, if you have and can elaborate it would suggest you are right.

That said there's really very little I can see in relation to Barak in the mainstream media and that might be for a number of reasons. Obviously the highest profile person under the microscope at the moment is Andrew W and part of me does wonder if whoever is in this ring of wrong 'uns have decided to chuck him under the bus in the hope it'll be a big enough scalp to close off the issue. Pretty much all accounts suggest he's someone who treats everyone appallingly and so it's likely there's little to no goodwill towards him from anyone and that could include fellow alleged predators. If that is their hope, I suspect (and hope) that they are wrong and that the people campaigning on this will continue to dig for the whole truth.
 
threespires said:
I think the extent to which your premise is true depends on who else is in the same boat as Barak but is being treated differently from him? My limited understanding is that Barak's name has come up now because the posthumous memoir refers to an ex-prime minster and this seems to triangulate with some civil proceedings she previously took out in relation to Barak which he has strenuously denied ? So the question to me is are there other people named or inferred in the book in a similar way, who are not having the spotlight turned on them? If so you may have a point. However I've not followed the publication of the memoir closely enough to know whether that is the case or not, if you have and can elaborate it would suggest you are right.

That said there's really very little I can see in relation to Barak in the mainstream media and that might be for a number of reasons. Obviously the highest profile person under the microscope at the moment is Andrew W and part of me does wonder if whoever is in this ring of wrong 'uns have decided to chuck him under the bus in the hope it'll be a big enough scalp to close off the issue. Pretty much all accounts suggest he's someone who treats everyone appallingly and so it's likely there's little to no goodwill towards him from anyone and that could include fellow alleged predators. If that is their hope, I suspect (and hope) that they are wrong and that the people campaigning on this will continue to dig for the whole truth.
Click to expand...
The point was that the X poster who highlighted Barack's involvement had a very anti-Israel view to start with. He was more interested in the allegations against that specific person than anyone else involved, or showing concern for Epstein's victims. The fact it was a high-profile Israeli was his main concern.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
The point was that the X poster who highlighted Barack's involvement had a very anti-Israel view to start with. He was more interested in the allegations against that specific person than anyone else involved, or showing concern for Epstein's victims. The fact it was a high-profile Israeli was his main concern.
Click to expand...

Ah you were specifically pointing out one individuals agenda, sorry I misunderstood and thought you were making a broader point.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
You only have to look at the X timeline of the person who posted that to see his political views and why he's highlighting one specific individual who happens to be Israeli. Bet he's never said anything about Muslim or white British grooming gangs.
Click to expand...
In fairness, I hadn't read the rest of his timeline because the only engagement I have with that cesspit is when people share on here; the X account and it's author are obviously repulsive. That doesn't change the fact that the media hasn't addressed an ex-Israeli PM being implicated in these heinous crimes; and you'd be naive to think the current climate has nothing to do with that.

Like you, I want everyone involved in this to face justice. But we both know that won't happen.
 
Blue and true said:
I wonder why the Western media are protecting the scumbag? Anyone?
Click to expand...

The fact that they are is suspicious. But you'd have to ask them.
I happened to see it on X I've no idea why there aren't others being named of whatever nationality or creed but if I see them I'll post them here. If the media is selective in its outrage about sexual crimes it makes them look cowardly , and depraved frankly.
If it was say Sadiq Khan what do you think it'd be like?
We all know the answer to that
As it isn't the media has taken its ball home to mummy the spineless gutless cowards.
 
Fucking bent and corrupt has fuck.

You can imagine what kind of secret deals and all the secret money that has been given to him and his family all his life that nobody will ever find out about.

This is just 1 example of many.

www.bbc.co.uk

Prince Andrew took money from firm linked to ripped-off pensioners

The King's brother was paid thousands by a businessman linked to a wealth management firm which ripped off pension savers.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
The epstien list can be found online....if you need to know. I was shocked when reading as the some were blacked out. It named some top heads .... various government, celebrities and mega rich....made me wonder who were the black covered up folk.

Anyway, I stopped caring with this.
 
Vienna_70 said:
I’m waiting for it to be confirmed that the orange, racist idiotic in the White House is in the Epstein Files.

We all know that he is; that’s why they haven’t been published in full.
Click to expand...
I m not for or against Trump...

Bit in looking into it years ago....epstien used the video of him with Trump to give himself more pull.

They had a brief thing in Miami, after that Trump cut all ties. Then he was charged,(epstien) for gross activity there. The vid of the two together was when Donald was single and they were in a club with adults.

I don't think there is anything between them , bar a brief time in the 90s before the hype of epstien in the late 90s.
 
ali benarbia's studs said:
The epstien list can be found online....if you need to know. I was shocked when reading as the some were blacked out. It named some top heads .... various government, celebrities and mega rich....made me wonder who were the black covered up folk.

Anyway, I stopped caring with this.
Click to expand...
Where is that? I have read various reports, that say people like Clinton and Stephen Hawking were there but a complete list exists?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top