I thought it was weird enough to hear the women who he abused constantly referring to him As Jeffrey in the documentary.There are many things that just don't add up in this story, from the initial Acosta 'sweetheart deal' to his supposed suicide in custody.
When you consider the number of businessmen, politicians, lawyers, law enforcement, Royals and other prominent people allegedly up to their necks in young girls and whatever else Jeffery was up to then it's no surprise that the whole thing whiffs of a massive cover up.
If that’s what they knew him as, what’s remotely weird about it?I thought it was weird enough to hear the women who he abused constantly referring to him As Jeffrey in the documentary.
But a Blue Moon regular....
I'm not disputing the autopsy stuff, but it just worries me that Facebook are funding fact checking of certain stories in the media, when they are pretty much flat out refusing to carry out fact checking of certain individuals on their other platforms.Fair enough. It doesnt need to be a fact check website. Books will do. Facts tell you that the claim that the same person did not do all those autopsies as this viral claim says. It is bullshit, factually wrong.
If you’d been raped, bum raped and forced to do stuff against your will you’d call the **** by their first name?If that’s what they knew him as, what’s remotely weird about it?
Some people would, for sure.If you’d been raped, bum raped and forced to do stuff against your will you’d call the **** by their first name?
I wouldn’t.
If you’d been raped, bum raped and forced to do stuff against your will you’d call the **** by their first name?
I wouldn’t.
They can’t find her.
They can’t find her.