Don't know if he's guilty or not but anybody who has seen how he's acted since the accusations were made will probably be leaning towards him being a bit of a wrong'un.
Hes hardly come across as a trustworthy defendant has he?
But, whilst the circumstantial evidence is pretty damning I doubt it's enough to convict.
I'll stick to my opinion I've held about him for years - he's a bit of a wet blanket who would likely be unemployed and bothering people in wetherspoons on a daily basis if he wasn't born into that weird cult.