mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Let's just say, I know and if you don't want to agree, fine. It's no skin off my back.As far as you know
Let's just say, I know and if you don't want to agree, fine. It's no skin off my back.As far as you know
No I don’t really know and not really bothered, just getting my post count up with inconsequential nothings reallyLet's just say, I know and if you don't want to agree, fine. It's no skin off my back.
I would not have defended saville , that was offensive to say , since a young child i always thought a least he was a creepy pervert take it backNo, I said that Kaz would defend saville, now seeing that saville spent plenty of time with the royals, at a time that rumours surrounding him were rife them I’m not in the realms of real conspiracy theories to suggest they would know about those rumours but choose to ignore them. After all, we’re all in it together….
He will be interviewed here by the US prosecutors and the interview taped.Fuck me Andrew could face being requested to attend trial ........ happy Platinum Jubilee mum
I don't think the Royals would have had very much knowledge of the in's and out's (so to speak) of Saville's private life, just his public persona.No, I said that Kaz would defend saville, now seeing that saville spent plenty of time with the royals, at a time that rumours surrounding him were rife them I’m not in the realms of real conspiracy theories to suggest they would know about those rumours but choose to ignore them. After all, we’re all in it together….
'Sleeping'...andrew was not "sleeping with a 17 year old". epstein was a convicted child trafficker who forced young girls to have sex with him and his coterie and that is what andrew did. it was essentially rape
He must be in a minority of one.'Sleeping'...