Erling Haaland

Do you want City to sign Erling Haaland?


  • Total voters
    832

kaz7

Well-Known Member
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
127,000
Location
Plugging my brain in
Half of these players at City would not even be here if it was not for Pep.

We are fairly dependent on him.

City will find it lot harder to attract players once hes gone.

Pep factor is our only compensation against the prestige of Barca, Real, Bayern.

Once Pep is gone, we will have to compensate this by money, like PSG are doing.
more bollocks
 

SWPISHOME

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
6,636
Location
93:20 May 13th 2012
Half of these players at City would not even be here if it was not for Pep.

We are fairly dependent on him.

City will find it lot harder to attract players once hes gone.

Pep factor is our only compensation against the prestige of Barca, Real, Bayern.

Once Pep is gone, we will have to compensate this by money, like PSG are doing.
You mean what like the Rags do?

Throw more and more money at massive salaries so players will join...Because they used to be a big club, Now they are are club that nobody gives a fuck about other than a massive pay packet.
 

Berts Neck

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 Jan 2014
Messages
601
Half of these players at City would not even be here if it was not for Pep.

We are fairly dependent on him.

City will find it lot harder to attract players once hes gone.

Pep factor is our only compensation against the prestige of Barca, Real, Bayern.

Once Pep is gone, we will have to compensate this by money, like PSG are doing.
Chelsea seem to have bought a few good players at a reasonable cost with Lampard at the helm..Sure Pep is an attraction, but I do not for one minute think we will be looking at Championship players once he goes. Frankly, it is unlikely that we will be looking at Alan Ball levels of management when he leaves either, so feel confident given our success over the last 10 years, whoever comes in will get good players, which believe it or not happened before Pep entered the frame.
 

himalayan_blues

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 Feb 2013
Messages
627
As tolmie said when we hear the idea of city putting a bid for kane in the media thats the point he signs for us. Duncan castle mentioned our bid in the media. 'May be thats it.
 

BlueBrain

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 Aug 2017
Messages
442
As tolmie said when we hear the idea of city putting a bid for kane in the media thats the point he signs for us. Duncan castle mentioned our bid in the media. 'May be thats it.
When did tolmie ever say that? Are you confusing him with Ahsan who said it on Steve’s channel?
 

Coatigan

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 Jun 2019
Messages
5,106
Team supported
Manchester City
As tolmie said when we hear the idea of city putting a bid for kane in the media thats the point he signs for us. Duncan castle mentioned our bid in the media. 'May be thats it.

What he said was when you see news of levy rejecting our bid. Actual news, actual rejection, actual bid. Not some shitty tweet by shitty Castles.
 

BillyShears

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 Aug 2004
Messages
9,177
Location
King Kunta
What he said was when you see news of levy rejecting our bid. Actual news, actual rejection, actual bid. Not some shitty tweet by shitty Castles.

Actual news of a bid will come in exactly that fashion. A tweet by a journalist saying "Spurs have rejected City's bid". You won't see Levy on the news talking about it and City won't put a statement on their website saying Spurs rejected our bid.
 

Coatigan

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 Jun 2019
Messages
5,106
Team supported
Manchester City
Actual news of a bid will come in exactly that fashion. A tweet by a journalist saying "Spurs have rejected City's bid". You won't see Levy on the news talking about it and City won't put a statement on their website saying Spurs rejected our bid.

I'm pretty sure you know what I mean and doubt you think i'm actually expecting the bbc having levy on at 10pm.

Granted, it will be tweeted online. But if genuine or believable, it will get a lot more coverage than this. Sky sports, the main media cohort etc, will all claim it, instantly everywhere. This is a pretty feeble one. Doesn't even say when, or anything really. There could have been one last year. or January. I'm reading nothing into it.

EDIT. he didn't even tweet it btw. It is a 3rd party tweet of something he mentioned in a podcast in passing.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account?

Register now!
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.