I’m not going to bother responding to a comment by someone who doesn’t know anything about Brazil or Brazilian television, but the least you could have done is gotten who Bayern played against right.The Dortmund v Eintracht Frankfurt match was likely to be better than German rags v Köln.
I’m not willing to take the wage excuse after reports that we were willing to pay Messi Last summer more than PSG is paying now, which is already an obscene amount.The fees for Kane will be astronomical too. Difference is Haaland could lead the line for 10+ years, and I doubt Kane would last any longer than 2-3 seasons. Wages would be pretty similar
by your definition then almost any team in england is a weak team (since kane is constantly the top goalscorer), which begs the question of if you play in england with those weak teams, why you prefer erling haaland over someone who constantly shits on those "weak teams".What has Kane had great performances against all his career? It was mostly weak teams. Frankfurt is one of the best in the Bundesliga again this year
by your definition then almost any team in england is a weak team (since kane is constantly the top goalscorer), which begs the question of if you play in england with those weak teams, why you prefer erling haaland over someone who constantly shits on those "weak teams".
I mean, why does the club even want Kane then?No, I meant that Kane doesn’t do as well against the better teams, which is not shocking, as they are better defenses. But you have other players who do better than him even from weaker teams.
But we also sign players to play in Europe. When are people going to accept that? We should aim to reach the UCL semifinals every year. That doesn’t happen by accident
Raiola won’t move him on unless Haaland wants it himself. Just look at Verratti for example, who’s been at PSG for almost 10 yearsThe fees will be higher with the Haaland deal, Raiola will make sure of that and with him being a Raiola client I doubt anyone will be getting 10 years out of him, 4-5 max.
I made a mistake. I own up to it. And if you aren't going to respond don't respond. It won't break my heart. Personally, not being liked by you isn't a big deal to me. You don't come across as someone I'd much like either.I’m not going to bother responding to a comment by someone who doesn’t know anything about Brazil or Brazilian television, but the least you could have done is gotten who Bayern played against right.
I have always said that Kane is acceptable as an option. But there is a reason why we value him a certain way and now we may be left with overpaying to avoid a problematic season. And I love Pep but he has his vanity projects. Right now he’s got his eyes on that English team, but let’s not go thereI mean, why does the club even want Kane then?
Is Pep not signing another contract?I don’t think that many people prefers Kane over Haaland. Seems to me that most people want Haaland. Although Kane is the better player at the moment and more complete I think it’s much closer than a lot of people believe. Kane wasn’t half the player of what Haaland is at 21. With Pep only having 2 years left on his contract it’s understandable he wants Kane, but I think we could be missing out on a future balon d’or winner here
I disagree. It's common knowledge that Haaland wants to play in the PL, I just hope he doesn't sign for the rags for next season.