You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Erling Haaland
- Thread starter JOGAMIGMOG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Tricky_Trev
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 32,426
Because he costs far more than Kane and we have a budget to comply with FFP. The money his Dad and agent want must be immense and they know they have a better chance of getting that cash next summer when the transfer fee is lower. When I think of clubs that are more willing to pay those agent fees, everything points to the rags replacing Cavani next summer with Haaland.Is it common knowledge?
I believe if he wanted to play in the Prem then he would be wearing Blue this season,we were all in for him and then we suddenly switched to Kane....why was that? And surely Dortmund would rather 130m this season than half that next?
Dribble
Well-Known Member
I think the feeling is we need to replace Aguero now, not in 12 months. Unlike the Rags with Cavani, Rashford & Martial, we've only got Jesus as a recognised senior No 9, so it's unfortunate in respect to Haaland that our needs are more acute.Chelsea look sorted with Lukaku, we will probably get Kane. Mbappe seems to want Madrid so it may come down to rags Bayern and PSG, I cant see Liverpool being in for him but you never know.
Can't say as I'm enthusiastic getting Kane if it means missing out on Haaland.
The same applied to Chelsea, but they've resolved that with Lukaku, who also have Werner & Abraham (for now) too. Monday will tell us a lot about our pursuit for a striker. If we don't land Kane, only then will I expect us to be balls deep in the mix for Haaland next summer...
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
You’re living in the pastBecause he costs far more than Kane and we have a budget to comply with FFP. The money his Dad and agent want must be immense and they know they have a better chance of getting that cash next summer when the transfer fee is lower. When I think of clubs that are more willing to pay those agent fees, everything points to the rags replacing Cavani next summer with Haaland.
Dribble
Well-Known Member
Our window isn't over yet. It seems the Rag's is. Sancho was a long term target, for £50m less than they were apparently quoted last summer. Varane was touted as the first £100m defender. Getting him for £40m is another decent move.They’ve spent more than us 120m no out going either yet
Everything I've seen from ManUre this summer suggests they're keeping their powder dry for Haaland next summer.
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
Getting his buddy from Dortmund and keeping the Norwegian manager does seem like a strategyOur window isn't over yet. It seems the Rag's is. Sancho was a long term target, for £50m less than they were apparently quoted last summer. Varane was touted as the first £100m defender. Getting him for £40m is another decent move.
Everything I've seen from ManUre this summer suggests they're keeping their powder dry for Haaland next summer.
Dribble
Well-Known Member
My thoughts exactly.Because he costs far more than Kane and we have a budget to comply with FFP. The money his Dad and agent want must be immense and they know they have a better chance of getting that cash next summer when the transfer fee is lower. When I think of clubs that are more willing to pay those agent fees, everything points to the rags replacing Cavani next summer with Haaland.
Because he costs far more than Kane and we have a budget to comply with FFP. The money his Dad and agent want must be immense and they know they have a better chance of getting that cash next summer when the transfer fee is lower. When I think of clubs that are more willing to pay those agent fees, everything points to the rags replacing Cavani next summer with Haaland.
If you look at the numbers for him next year with his buyout and father agent payoffs plus Haaland will be wanting at least 450/600k a week you looking at a totally money layout of 260m that’s including a 5 year deal to Haaland! Plus no guarantees he will stick around renew his contract after 3 years with the agent they have. Massive gamble and why we staying away from him..
Plus we'd have to gamble on not buying a striker this year and then no guarantee next year that he says yes, we have no choice but to stay away.If you look at the numbers for him next year with his buyout and father agent payoffs plus Haaland will be wanting at least 450/600k a week you looking at a totally money layout of 260m that’s including a 5 year deal to Haaland! Plus no guarantees he will stick around renew his contract after 3 years with the agent they have. Massive gamble and why we staying away from him..
Plus we'd have to gamble on not buying a striker this year and then no guarantee next year that he says yes, we have no choice but to stay away.
Yep that’s why we not in for him! We get Kane got four five years of him at a top level !
- Status
- Not open for further replies.