Just a timely reminder. The issue for City isn't just the exorbitant fee, it's mainly the wages, & the ripple effect it could have on our financial model.
If half our team wanted parity with Haaland on a reputed £600k per week, what would happen to our profit/loss bottom line, & FFP? :-|
If half the team want parity with a 30 goal per season striker, then we are in clover, and selling a few of them would reap untold rewards!
Players get paid on production, and forwards get paid more for their particular kind of production.
Any defender making more than a midfielder is a bloody good defender. Any midfielder making more than a goal scoring attacker is a world class midfielder. It’s the natural order of things, with the very odd exception.
If Haaland has the season he had last season during this season, then he writes the numbers onto a blank cheque and there are about 5 or 6 clubs who can sign it.
At his level, it’s about player power and he could quite happily take €5M LESS per season to play for the club he wants to play for. That’s just the way it is!
We could agree to pay him €24M per year, but if he wants to play in Madrid and they offer €18M, will he lose sleep over a paltry €6M/yr? He will make that up and more by signing a new Adidas deal, a Santander deal, a car deal, a Pepsi deal….
I’m pretty sure he already knows where he wants to play, and I’m pretty sure it’s not City.
But, he’s you g enough that he could actually take a 4 year deal from City, walk away at the end of it, in his prime, and get yet another massive pay day elsewhere, if he wanted to.
The kid can write his own ticket at this point, because that release clause is worth more than his weight in gold!!