Trickyblues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2021
- Messages
- 2,069
- Team supported
- City
“Could be this weekend”.
could also be next weekend. Or the weekend after that.
Like Kane didI think of it like this, Haaland has a verbal agreement with City as he has already said YES. Therefore he will sign the contract at City.
Did Kane have a written release clause?Like Kane did
Did Uby mention a written clause?Did Kane have a written release clause?
No, but Kane wanted to sign only the club wouldn't let him as there was no formal agreement to sell, spurs held all the power. Haaland has a formal written agreement with his club so they have absolutely no power to stop him. Huge differenceDid Uby mention a written clause?
Signing the best striker in the Premier League and one of the best in the world at 28 would have been far from a panic buy. I agree Haaland would be the first choice of the 2 but we aren’t suddenly bidding for Martial or Danny Ings because a past it legend in Serge was leaving.He would of been. If it meant we missed out on haaland. We wanted aguero to stay another year, According to the poster I replied to, to allow for a haaland bid a at the end of that year, Aguero rejected that extra year and we were a top class striker short. We went to plan b and tested the water with Spurs and Kane. I think Kane would be seen as a panic buy now. Especially at the figures being reported. Had it gone through and Haaland wouldn’t even be an option now. I think we dodged one with Kane.