Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
The article is from the '2nd of April'.

I don’t know if they’re just now translating it or simply recycling it, but even the caption says the cover is from January. They’re already running out of stories…
 
People saying they have more confidence in the signing of Kane over Haaland, claiming he's more suited to our team or better for us somehow, wow...

That's adorable possibly if a 4 year old is innocently saying that cos he likes some goals he scored but from an adult that is complete drivel, that's like saying Blackburn should've signed Steve Bull over Alan Shearer, it's like hearing someone say they think Colin Calderwood looked a better player for Spurs at centreback than a young Sol Campbell, or like saying Chris Powell is better than Ashley Cole for England back in 2001 while proclaiming he is just an overrated Arsenal kid... "get Powell back in the team" none of those are even slightly correct.

I'm pointing out the difference in class here because it's the very same I'm not even exaggerating, if you honestly believe Kane is a better option than Haaland for us, or will be more of a danger to opponents and more of a help to teammates... then you must believed some or all of the above examples to have been true for their time, Haaland is way above Kane in terms of levels or what he'd offer us.

Either, A: you're trolling. B: you're Arry Kane trying to convince us all you're a better option. Or, C: your judgement of football is so incomprehensibly poor at this time at least, that you should honestly take a break before you think to yourself what was I thinking.
Maybe your brain has gone into overdrive we all have brain farts at times and you're clearly having one bigtime, or maybe it's simply cos you clearly know nowt about football.

Whatever the case you need some advice, so here it is...
View attachment 39554
I'd prefer Haaland because of the age and much easier deal to do but let's not pretend that Harry Kane isn't the better footballer he's way ahead of Haaland in terms of an all round footballer and probably is the better fit for city at the moment.
 
People saying they have more confidence in the signing of Kane over Haaland, claiming he's more suited to our team or better for us somehow, wow...

That's adorable possibly if a 4 year old is innocently saying that cos he likes some goals he scored but from an adult that is complete drivel, that's like saying Blackburn should've signed Steve Bull over Alan Shearer, it's like hearing someone say they think Colin Calderwood looked a better player for Spurs at centreback than a young Sol Campbell, or like saying Chris Powell is better than Ashley Cole for England back in 2001 while proclaiming he is just an overrated Arsenal kid... "get Powell back in the team" none of those are even slightly correct.

I'm pointing out the difference in class here because it's the very same I'm not even exaggerating, if you honestly believe Kane is a better option than Haaland for us, or will be more of a danger to opponents and more of a help to teammates... then you must believed some or all of the above examples to have been true for their time, Haaland is way above Kane in terms of levels or what he'd offer us.

Either, A: you're trolling. B: you're Arry Kane trying to convince us all you're a better option. Or, C: your judgement of football is so incomprehensibly poor at this time at least, that you should honestly take a break before you think to yourself what was I thinking.
Maybe your brain has gone into overdrive we all have brain farts at times and you're clearly having one bigtime, or maybe it's simply cos you clearly know nowt about football.

Whatever the case you need some advice, so here it is...
View attachment 39554
Wow how patronising
 
People are really forcing themselves into an alternate reality where a fully-fit Harry Kane wouldn't absolutely incinerate the league in this City team. Haaland has the potential to do the same, or even better, and for a longer time, but there are still question marks around him that are exclamation points around Kane. At the end of the day, either of them would be brilliant purchases for us while our squad lacks that No.9 figure, and going for Haaland does not mean you have to fry your brain into a place where Kane is some Championship-level chump and not one of the best strikers the league has ever seen.

In any case, the Kane ship has sailed. Let's focus on winning trophies this season and then signing the Viking in the summer.
 
People are really forcing themselves into an alternate reality where a fully-fit Harry Kane wouldn't absolutely incinerate the league in this City team. Haaland has the potential to do the same, or even better, and for a longer time, but there are still question marks around him that are exclamation points around Kane. At the end of the day, either of them would be brilliant purchases for us while our squad lacks that No.9 figure, and going for Haaland does not mean you have to fry your brain into a place where Kane is some Championship-level chump and not one of the best strikers the league has ever seen.

In any case, the Kane ship has sailed. Let's focus on winning trophies this season and then signing the Viking in the summer.
I am not sure there would be much difference between Kane and Haaland in our team. maybe if our opponent allow us to play an open game then maybe Kane's passing might make a difference but most of the time we play against parked buses with our striker inside the box in that case I might prefer Haaland for his physicality
 
I'd prefer Haaland because of the age and much easier deal to do but let's not pretend that Harry Kane isn't the better footballer he's way ahead of Haaland in terms of an all round footballer and probably is the better fit for city at the moment.
He's EIGHT years further along in his career...I should hope so..but that doesn't mean Haaland is not the far better signing for this team at this time...
 
People saying they have more confidence in the signing of Kane over Haaland, claiming he's more suited to our team or better for us somehow, wow...

That's adorable possibly if a 4 year old is innocently saying that cos he likes some goals he scored but from an adult that is complete drivel, that's like saying Blackburn should've signed Steve Bull over Alan Shearer, it's like hearing someone say they think Colin Calderwood looked a better player for Spurs at centreback than a young Sol Campbell, or like saying Chris Powell is better than Ashley Cole for England back in 2001 while proclaiming he is just an overrated Arsenal kid... "get Powell back in the team" none of those are even slightly correct.

I'm pointing out the difference in class here because it's the very same I'm not even exaggerating, if you honestly believe Kane is a better option than Haaland for us, or will be more of a danger to opponents and more of a help to teammates... then you must believed some or all of the above examples to have been true for their time, Haaland is way above Kane in terms of levels or what he'd offer us.

Either, A: you're trolling. B: you're Arry Kane trying to convince us all you're a better option. Or, C: your judgement of football is so incomprehensibly poor at this time at least, that you should honestly take a break before you think to yourself what was I thinking.
Maybe your brain has gone into overdrive we all have brain farts at times and you're clearly having one bigtime, or maybe it's simply cos you clearly know nowt about football.

Whatever the case you need some advice, so here it is...
View attachment 39554
Opinionated and patronising view.

Your lack of understanding of how to build a top team shines through your argument.
Constructing a team of fantastic individuals will bring highs but also lows and doesn't create consistency - something you need to win the league.
Kane would fit our current set up perfectly and score shit loads of goals hence the arguments put forward by some. Haarland would probably score even more but it may take a period of adaptation from others in the team and lessen their impact (until Haarland adapts)
 
People saying they have more confidence in the signing of Kane over Haaland, claiming he's more suited to our team or better for us somehow, wow...

That's adorable possibly if a 4 year old is innocently saying that cos he likes some goals he scored but from an adult that is complete drivel, that's like saying Blackburn should've signed Steve Bull over Alan Shearer, it's like hearing someone say they think Colin Calderwood looked a better player for Spurs at centreback than a young Sol Campbell, or like saying Chris Powell is better than Ashley Cole for England back in 2001 while proclaiming he is just an overrated Arsenal kid... "get Powell back in the team" none of those are even slightly correct.

I'm pointing out the difference in class here because it's the very same I'm not even exaggerating, if you honestly believe Kane is a better option than Haaland for us, or will be more of a danger to opponents and more of a help to teammates... then you must believed some or all of the above examples to have been true for their time, Haaland is way above Kane in terms of levels or what he'd offer us.

Either, A: you're trolling. B: you're Arry Kane trying to convince us all you're a better option. Or, C: your judgement of football is so incomprehensibly poor at this time at least, that you should honestly take a break before you think to yourself what was I thinking.
Maybe your brain has gone into overdrive we all have brain farts at times and you're clearly having one bigtime, or maybe it's simply cos you clearly know nowt about football.

Whatever the case you need some advice, so here it is...
View attachment 39554
Ridiculous post
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.